Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (65881)	12/8/1999 3:24:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

I think this article is basically agreeing with my pov, that private institutions are free to have quotas and are the better for it. Isn't this essentially saying that Cal is bound by racial-invisibility laws? Thats a reaction to public knee-jerk sentiment, having nothing to do with what is right or wrong for the students involved. But since Cal is a public institution they have no choice in the matter. But Noguera believes Harvard has the freedom and the will to improve diversity, unlike Berkeley. The California school is bound by the UC Board of Regents 1995 vote to stop considering race in hiring and admissions and Californians' 1996 endorsement of Proposition 209, which did much the same thing in all branches of public life.