SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (82377)12/8/1999 4:53:00 PM
From: niceguy767  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1583405
 
Hi Paul:

Had the impression you were pro Intel and anti AMD. Don't know why I concluded that. Hasty analysis, I suppose. My apology! Your investment strategy certainly can't be construed as anti AMD. I'm genuinely happy that you have come out ahead wrt AMD.

Seems both AMD and Intel took their lumps today! My guess is it's a one-day setback for AMD anyway. Just too much "value" for it to remain at $30 too much longer, don't you think?



To: Paul Engel who wrote (82377)12/8/1999 4:55:00 PM
From: kapkan4u  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1583405
 
<And I bought a tonne more a few weeks ago at $26 9/16.>

Hi Paul,

Congrats on good timing. BTW the Dresden gun is loaded and AMD has Intel in the sights and a finger on the trigger.

Kap



To: Paul Engel who wrote (82377)12/9/1999 2:01:00 AM
From: Kenith Lee  Respond to of 1583405
 
I bought AMD at $16.50 about 6 months ago - and have sold puts and covered calls nearly every month along the way - bringing my average cost basis to about $14.

And I bought a tonne more a few weeks ago at $26 9/16.


Perhaps your copper contamination double secret clogged your judgement and your Calls took away your original cheap shares.