Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorrie coey who wrote (63256)	12/8/1999 7:07:00 PM
From: Scarecrow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Well, I guess that, when it comes to (and I hate to use the word in this context with you, since it's a mockery to call it such) "discourse" with you, it says that I'm like many people: I insist during the traffic jam that I will not look at the car wreck when I draw near. But, as I approach, I am unable to resist the urge to stare, mouth agape and rubber-neck at the wreckage. It's nothing to be proud of, is it? And, please note, that in this (and I hate to use the word in this context with you, since it's a mockery to call it such) "dialogue," I am not alone in this regard. After ignoring your posts to me for some time, I felt compelled to respond to your incoherent dictionary stalkings. And, in this instance, you are correct: I should be ashamed for doing so. You really think everything's about you, doncha? And, of course, only a narcissist like you could admire the narcissist-in-chief. You've proven to one and all with your hourly evidentiary updates that you're a moron who switches topics through either an inability to engage in coherent discussion or an inability to refute the logic displayed before you by the many people on this thread. Why don't we just leave it at that, shall we and spare us all the diarrhetic incontinence of your reply.