SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (82394)12/8/1999 6:52:00 PM
From: kash johal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579128
 
Elmer,

Re:"I think we should drop this thread because we are probably boring everybody to death."

LOL, Elmer.

You know you were WRONG.

I haven't seen anybody weasel out like you.

YOU have been SHOWN that Pmax=Imax x Vmax DOES NOT apply to INTELs numbers directly as well.

YOU are well aware that they AVERAGE the ICC with a heavy instruction load use that to determine MAXIMUM POWER.

YOU MUST THEN BE AWARE that the ICCmax published is the maximum current NOT the average current.

BUT YOU KEEP BSING and posting CRAP.

Like the WAVE METER. The idea that there is a little ole elmer class engineer testing power is AMUSING using a little ole meter.

AS YOU KNOW very well they test ICC static and dynamic directly on all the leading ATE systems.

NO NEED for little METERS ole boy.

CUT THE CRAP AND BS will you when you know better.

regards,

Kash J.



To: Elmer who wrote (82394)12/8/1999 8:07:00 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH  Respond to of 1579128
 
Re: "I think we should drop this thread because we are probably boring everybody to death."

Will somebody wake me up when this testing discussion is over?? ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

THE WATSONYOUTH