Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldsnow who wrote (15486)	12/10/1999 5:48:00 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

Goldsnow, I live in Belgium, a country where tit-for-tat language-squabbles are even worse than in Canada.... Both French-speaking Qu‚becois and Dutch-speaking Flemings consider their respective languages as the epitomes of their cultural legacies. Hence they view all other languages as potential threats to their very existence as a unique, endangered cultural species! Add to it the political and financial grievances that have plagued these countries for so many years (in Belgium, political pundits routinely refer to "North-South transfers", ie billions of $ syphoned off from prosperous Flanders by no-good Wallonia.....) and you get the current Cultural Cold War that increasingly pervades many countries around the world. I guess it's part of the backlash against globalization (remember how it climaxed in Seattle a few days ago). Ironically, some countries who vehemently oppose the Anglo-American hegemony in culture are themselves threatened by their own devolutive parochialisms: France's Bretons, Corses, and Basques wanted to change the French Constitution which stipulates that French is the language of the Republic.... and militate in favor of the schoolteaching of their respective patois. But here, the very same linguistic jingoists who got roused by the Anglo-saxon intrusion on the French way of life, turned "global" on a national scale in sweating their diverse linguistic minorities into using French --exclusively. Those Kultur-thumping pundits are, indeed, well aware of the critical role national languages have played in moulding and in fostering the cast of mind of their fellow citizens (remember Ivan Ilich's comments on the invention of Castilian, Spain's official language). So long as a unified lingo is restricted to the national framework, it's fine with the interest of Europe's diverse and conflicting bourgeoisies --since it allows them to stir up enough chauvinism among their respective plebs when required.... But as soon as some new, international officialese starts permeating their social fabrics --such as today's English-- then all alarm bells get lit since a common, universal lingo will inescapably shape a new "global-minded" citizen, less likely to fall prey to the parochial finagling of its ruling elite. Gus.

To: goldsnow who wrote (15486)	12/10/1999 7:08:00 AM
From: MNI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

I wonder what had happened, if ... :-)) ... ... Sony once upon a time had been resolved to enter the American (and European) markets with Japanese language products, instead of adopting English ... would I understand the kanjis for 'Play', 'Record', 'Stop' and 'Rewind' by now? Or would the Asian world be richer in electronic consumer products than the Western part? Or would America be full of companys that are sued against by Japanese companys for reverse engineering of Japanese products? (The engineering part being basically the translation of the scripture on the buttons and in the manual?) Just a :-)) reflection ... Regards MNI.