Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HG who wrote (86924)	12/9/1999 11:06:00 PM
From: dclapp	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

happy, what you should understand is that a wildly overvalued market is the "gloomiest" and "doomiest" possible scenario. doug

To: HG who wrote (86924)	12/10/1999 1:52:00 PM
From: HairBall	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

happy_girl: The problem is that LG and the resident bears chase away (read that as ridicule, humiliate, kick out) all bullish analysis which does not conform to their preconceived notions. In the absence of balance - it has become a yes-sir-the-sky-is-falling type of thread. The doom and gloom scenario is not happening. So I'd think someone from that thread would listen and try to understand the counterarguements...... BWDIK ? As LG once told me when I tried to discuss - maybe I should start a newsletter !!! End of discussion !!!! LOL WHAT A CROCK OF SH*T. I always promoted both bull and bear. There were/are some strong bears that populate the MDA thread and not many strong bullish posters.. However, to say I humiliated, ridiculed and kicked out posters because they were bullish is A LIE! I only asked folks to follow the thread guidelines. However, jumping on the thread to spew out a GUT FEEL was not following the guidelines. If you want to cheerlead and just spew out random GUT FEELS, I have created a thread just for your type: Subject 32170 Be sure and read the header. LG