SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: golden_tee who wrote (5440)12/10/1999 2:39:00 PM
From: BelowTheCrowd  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
Robert, you seemed to miss:

"I say treat it like you'd treat a supposedly hot drug in Phase 3 clinical trials. Too many of those turn out to be disasters."

Which was Greenberg's conclusion. You highlighted the fact that he has heard that some people believe the company really has something. If you'd ever read Greenberg before, you'd know he's always extremely skeptical when he "is told" that "smart people" are "getting in." A recurrent theme of his, and one that he often comments on, especially when it happens in the absence of any institutional following or other confirmation.

I don't read it as particularly bullish.

No position.

mg



To: golden_tee who wrote (5440)12/10/1999 2:55:00 PM
From: BelowTheCrowd  Respond to of 10293
 
Actually Robert, let me restate the case even better.

1) Greenberg puts together an index.

2) He calls it the "Greenberg Garbage Index."

3) He comments that "...the Greenberg Garbage Index is an index that could be shorted. Because ... most of these stocks are likely to disappear from radar. Until the next round of hype hits."

4) He includes Valence in it.

5) You somehow manage to construe from his comments that he is bullish on the stock.

I find myself agreeing with Wexler that you are completely delusional. VLNC may or may not do well, I haven't followed recent events enough to know or care. But you seem to really need help...

mg