To: johnzhang who wrote (12543 ) 12/29/1999 11:14:00 AM From: StockHawk Respond to of 54805
Handheld game, from the GG newsgroup: Subject: gg in handhelds Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 13:21:34 -0500 From: "E M" <qwik@iname.com> The question is "will there be a gorilla game?" If so, then who are the players who can win? If we define the game in terms of wireless, I need help understanding Symbian (WAP I think I get) . The first space for the game to play out I believe is handheld OS; which Palm seems to have won. If we want to "buy the basket," one of the advantages of phone.com or Palm over Nokia, Sony, Motorola, MSFT, etc. is that they are more of a pure play in this area. buying the basket with the others means buying something which is 99% not about this space. Palm has got 80% of market-- to mix a metaphor-- in the palm of its hand. They are working to shed themselves of all production and trying to encourage a value chain of other companies to be built up around its core business, an enabling technology -- the operating system. This is an open but proprietary technology. Phone.com invented Wireless Application Protocol (WAP) which is by its nature non-proprietary; again one of the signs of a non-gorilla. Sony is licensing Palm OS , a good value chain partner if Palm assumes dominance. Same thing goes for Qualcomm. Jeff Hawkins at Handspring certainly intends to be part of the value chain.. Eli > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Subject: RE: gorillagame Digest #573 - 12/11/99 > From: "Geoffrey Moore" <geoffmoore@chasmgroup.com> > Date: Sun, 12 Dec 1999 08:44:33 -0800 > > Gang, > I think we ought to start a MSFT thread now, but in my view it is not Linux > that is the real competitive threat, but rather a product/service shift > taking place on top of Linux, the Web, etc. in which there is a value > migration from owning the product to getting the service without having to > own the product. In this new world, service sites become the locus of value > creation, not the PC. The PC does not go away--this is not a diminishing of > what MSFT has already accomplished--but it does become marginalized as the > world goes server-centric, and the edge clients expand to include lots of > non-PC elements. MSFT has a major play in both new worlds--MSN and WIndows > CE--but to date neither play has got traction, the one a laggard in the > godzilla game of portals behind the godzillas of AOL and Yahoo, the other a > chimp lagging behind Palm and being challenged by Symbian as well.