SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (82625)12/10/1999 4:18:00 PM
From: kash johal  Respond to of 1571929
 
Pravin,

Re:"$250M fund"

They might do better to actually deliver a 2 way and 4 way Athlon MB for server markets. And couple that with Athlons with larger off-chip cache.

These were due in Q4 as I recall, and they have suddenly vanished from the roadmap.

We now hear of AMD manufacturing Mustangs and thunderbolts etc in a few months with HUGE on -die cache. It is likely they will have manufacturing problems - clearly large full speed caches are non-trivial.

I wish they would take smaller steps that are deliverable even if it is a single CPU with larger on chip cache.

This was the ATIQ RAZA approach - small, measured steps etc.

The strategy and roadmap seems to have changed to shipping the biggest/fastest to beat Intel again.

Frankly if they can really deliver 900-1Ghz parts in volume in the near term with offchip cache this is what they should do and focus on.

But I sense this not the direction they are going in.

Just my $0.02.

regards,

Kash



To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (82625)12/13/1999 12:49:00 AM
From: Charles R  Respond to of 1571929
 
Pravin,

<Just as Intel has a $250 million fund to subsidize companies to develop for Itanium, AMD should start a fund to have workstation oriented CAD programs optimized for Sledgehammer -- if not for Athlon.>

Nice thought but one minor problem. Where do you suggest they get the money?

Chuck