SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SpudFarmer who wrote (53501)12/10/1999 4:25:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 152472
 


Data Mantra: Do It Now, Keep It Simple

By Mark Dziatkiewicz

SAN FRANCISCO—Success will reward those who get involved early, understand the market and keep it simple, say wireless
data proponents.

This mantra reverberated throughout the recent 1999 CDMA Americas Congress. Though addressed to a CDMA-oriented
audience, the advice applies to all wireless carriers looking beyond voice services.

Carriers stand to profit as voice becomes a commodity and subscribers crave Web access. “The wired world built the Internet but
it is incapable of delivering it to people anytime, anywhere,” says Bob Egan, research director for The Gartner Group.

Despite its dominance in Internet usage and wired data, the United States lags internationally on wireless data. “We really need to
catch up because the technology is here,” says Bob Carl, manager for Americas marketing at the Texas Instruments Wireless
Communications business unit. He points to the millions of short messages sent daily in Europe, successful data offerings in Japan
and Canada.

Eric Schultz, chairman and CEO of Wireless Knowledge LLC, suggests that carriers “get out on a personal level and experience
it,” and “understand the trends that are happening.”

To experience wireless data doesn't mean waiting for Wireless Application Protocol-enabled devices to penetrate the
marketplace. “Why aren't we doing more with the 14.4 [kilobits per second] we have today?” Schultz asks rhetorically.

The 250 million “eyeballs” connected via wireless services provide an excellent opportunity, and existing 2G handsets can
acclimate the user to the Internet with simple two-way interaction, according to Michael Buhrman, president and CEO for
@Mobile.com. “And in an Internet model of first-to-market-wins, this is a very good strategy.”

@Mobile and others agree Internet access through existing handsets is a viable option. Using phone keystrokes, users can access
and navigate specialized Internet content. The process can be an effective first experience and powerful in building loyal
customers, advocates say.

While data will attract some new customers, its addition and “sticky” nature can help retain existing customers and reduce churn.
One application provider, Bank of America, says it focuses on customer retention rather than acquisition. Waiting for WAP may
be a mistake, but ignoring the importance of voice could be another as carriers begin building data portals.

“Given the portal structure we've introduced, we make the user choose between voice and data,” contends Dave Weinstein, vice
president for marketing at @Mobile. Subscribers are already using voice “portals” and those need to be integrated along with data
access. “The view portal and voice portal are two sides of the same coin,” he says. “We need to introduce the mobile Internet [by
letting] them use the devices they have. Voice isn't the answer and neither is WAP.”

Regardless of portal type, most agree wireless data should be simple to use, which may
involve multiple devices and service providers. Egan lived “wireless only” for 30 days and concluded “no one wireless technology
will fit the profile of all wireless users,” at least on the enterprise side.

Overall, subscribers may be willing to pay more for wireless data access, but less is probably better. “People aren't willing to pay
much to use these services on the wireless device,” says Ken Arneson, president and CEO of Xypoint Corp. “They are used to
getting things free on the Internet, so [these services] need to cost just pennies.”



To: SpudFarmer who wrote (53501)12/10/1999 5:01:00 PM
From: jmanvegas  Respond to of 152472
 
Spudman: I was referring to YHOO's market cap of $100B, not AOL. But there are several on this thread that believe Q will be larger than AOL & CSCO down the road. In doing so, it would obviously move pass YHOO's market cap.

Q has rocked, it's no longer a matter of time. If Q rocks more up to the split and handset news, it will unrock after the split IMO. It would be a natural occurrence for the gorilla to take a nice consolidating rest before it gets hungry again and has to clear some bush.

But whatever happens, I'm not letting go of my shares. Looking forward to 2005 when "The Dick Tracy Era" is in full bloom.

jmanvegas