SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (63396)12/11/1999 10:55:00 AM
From: C Kahn  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
Neocon, I think you know Truedog well enough to know that he is not a hateful, violent person. And, like me and others, he will get angry sometimes, and retaliate verbally. But I don't agree that an apology should be demanded in this situation. If he must apologize than everyone else who posts on this thread should be made to apologize as well. Certain people know that if they keep posting antagonizing remarks, the receipient is going to eventually get angry, and if they don't want to deal with a person's anger, than they should stop posting antagonizing remarks to that person.



To: Neocon who wrote (63396)12/11/1999 12:32:00 PM
From: truedog  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Neo, a mouth, even as smart as LC's, would not be justification to a normal man to inflict bodily harm. My point was, and still is, that there are far too many people, both men and women, that do not behave in a normal, or rational, way and will react violently with very little provocation. In fact, all decent people should be aware of this, and avoid any confrontation wherever possible. There was a time when a driver could vent his frustration by shouting out the window, or making a hand gesture, and get only the same in return. These days, doing something like that can get you a bullet flying at you. As ridiculous as this may seem, it is, sadly, true.

^^TD^^