Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CDN. MOMO PUPPIES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Shaw who wrote (16817)	12/11/1999 3:33:00 PM
From: Lola	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36688

ARW is the same people as AMS ... yikes ... I'm staying away. Remember the 3 AMS hypsters? When I pointed out the company didn't have any money to do an Internet deal they were pumping one of them actually had the nerve to say I was an idiot. He said they didn't need money to get into an Internet deal since they could issue millions of shares instead. No thanks. Lola:)

To: Shaw who wrote (16817)	12/11/1999 5:07:00 PM
From: Kevin Hamlin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36688

Re: ARW I know what you mean about "false starts" Shaw. That concerned me too. I went back and looked at those periods. The two main differences are: 1) Much more sustained buying this time around on better volume...not just a big pop on nothing. 2) Huge buying by Merill. This was not evident on any of the previous occasions where the stock blipped up. As for the options, still looking into that one. Even with them counted in, this is still a tiny float. Regards, Kevin