SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Saturn V who wrote (82709)12/12/1999 2:01:00 AM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 1572371
 
Re: "I have the Microprocessor report at work, and I will post what it says on Monday."

Fine, post it but are you going to believe it over Intel?

EP



To: Saturn V who wrote (82709)12/12/1999 5:34:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572371
 
Saturn's right, Elmer. If I remember correctly, MPR says "Technically, Coppermine's L2 cache is half-speed." This is because the cache transfers a cacheline (32 bytes) every other clock.

It's no big deal, though. That back-side bus interface is so wide, an entire cacheline gets transferred in one clock, instead of four clocks on the older BSB interfaces. Perhaps the old BSB interface also had one dead clock in-between cacheline transfers, and this dead clock carried over into the Coppermine cache.

Tenchusatsu