SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : LastShadow's Position Trading -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LastShadow who wrote (26903)12/12/1999 8:20:00 PM
From: j g cordes  Respond to of 43080
 
Sober feedback welcome "...This is all terrible news for future corporate profitability."

"Pessimists Are Not Always Wrong

By Craig Thomas
12/10/99 11:24 AM ET

Now that the holiday season is in full swing, you
are likely seeing friends, family, and colleagues
that you have not seen since last year around this
time. Unfortunately, these reunions may not be full
of holiday cheer, particularly if you are an
economist that freely dispenses your opinions at
holiday gatherings.

If you are like most experienced watchers of the
economy, you have tried to be the voice of reason
across the last two years. As a result, your
opinions are now meeting with increasing
skepticism. Arguments of technological advances
and soaring productivity having nullified the laws
of diminishing returns are gaining wider
acceptance. Frankly, there may be more recent
evidence supporting the repeal of the business
cycle than support for previously accepted
economic theory. Worst case scenario, you may
have made that fateful comment to a
parent/friend/colleague telling them, "Now may
be a good time to count your profits and get out of
the stock market." Whether your advice was
followed or not, your credibility has been
stretched.

Take heart though, for your analysis is grounded
in solid, practical theory that is both tested across
time and supported by common sense. While
economists are accountable for underestimating
potential economic growth, there are variables
that can explain some of the discrepancies. First
and foremost, those that discount the existence of
inflationary pressure have quickly forgotten that
we are just now emerging from one of the
sharpest drops in commodity prices in recent
economic times. Sharply lower raw material
costs, particularly the cost of oil, helped to offset
building cost pressures elsewhere in the
economy. Further, the drop in commodity prices
was propagated by a significant downturn in what
was the fastest developing region in the global
economy, and which came very close to
enveloping much of the rest of the global
economy. To suggest that we can count on
falling/stagnant commodity prices such as these in
the outlook is to suggest that we can look forward
to other major foreign economies hanging on the
brink of collapse. Let's hope not.

Another bone of contention involves worker
productivity and wage pressures. A recent quote
accredited a well-known analyst with stating, in
effect, that the link between labor markets and
inflation has been proven intellectually bankrupt.
Recent data certainly seem to suggest that a
falling unemployment rate is not pressuring
wages. Also, productivity figures firmly establish
that worker efficiency is soaring. It seems the best
of all worlds.

How could the Federal Reserve economists or
any economist find fault with current trends, even
as the economy shows little sign of strain?

They can and do because it is intellectually
bankrupt to do otherwise. When reported data
suggest something counterintuitive to theory, the
knee-jerk reaction is to question the theory
instead of the data. In this case, it is the data that
needs to be questioned. The ECI is an incomplete
measure of labor costs and misses several of the
ways in which employees are being rewarded,
such as stock options, signing bonuses, and
promotions. Also, we can all see that it is very
difficult to find qualified workers. It costs more
to find them, hire them, and hold them. Further,
the deeper we dig into the labor market, the more
training will be necessary to maintain
productivity growth.

In fact, the more you hear about the details of the
economy, the worse it sounds. Labor is hard to
find, commodity prices are rising, productivity
growth will be hard to maintain even with the
latest technology, pricing power is almost
non-existent, interest rates are rising and imports
are soaring. This is all terrible news for future
corporate profitability."

from dismalscientist.com

Jim



To: LastShadow who wrote (26903)12/12/1999 10:12:00 PM
From: dr.putty  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 43080
 
Thanks alot for the explanation. Just a small SI problem I'm having, though: If I choose to view a chart with a tic frequency of Days, I get a chart going back to July no matter how many # of periods I type in. If I choose Weeks, I get a chart going back to 1997, even though I put in "30" for # of periods. Should I not get a chart that goes back 30 weeks?

Thanks again.