Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: engineer who wrote (53761)	12/13/1999 10:40:00 AM
From: John Westman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Nokia meeting came and went with no extraordinary news.http://wwwdb.nokia.com/pressrel/webpr.nsf/mostrecent/C225663600509DEDC2256846004321F6?opendocument

To: engineer who wrote (53761)	12/13/1999 11:02:00 AM
From: GO*QCOM	Respond to of 152472

Stale crow is alot harder to digest but eventually the digestive enzymes win and reality starts to rule the day, especially when a dragon is breathing down your back.

To: engineer who wrote (53761)	12/13/1999 3:28:00 PM
From: 100cfm	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

engineer <<Quick...name ONE Nokia phone in CDMA selling in todays market that works as advertised? So how many times have they introduced a phone and not sold it? So how much market share have they lost not being in CDMA?>> that has been my point exactly. there are others who are saying that nok doesn't need q and that anything they would need from Q they can get on the open market. THEN SOMEBODY PLEASE TELL ME WHY THEY DON'T HAVE A CDMA PHONE. IS IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT WORTH THEIR WHILE TO MAKE ONE THAT WORKS! 100