Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike M who wrote (1900)	12/13/1999 10:53:00 PM
From: Mad2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5582

Mike Sorry if that offends your sense of fairness. I must admit, however, coming from the guys who have accused this company and its management of fraud, that your objection is laughable if not preposterous. You infer that I have accused mgmt of fraud and then go on to refer to my objection as laughable and preposterous. Wrong Mike, you won't be able to find a post where I have refered to or accused GUMM mgmt of fraud. As I suggested before its best to keep to the subject at hand or the specifics of what is said instead of attacking the poster or infering something that isn't true. It's not about fairness, rather corectness. I am unaware of your wager with Dan but am uninterested. Here's the challenge Mike Should GUMM hit 30 (or how about 27, as within 10% is "near 30") and stay above that for 10 day's between now and say mid summer....I'll post a public appology on this board and discontinue posting here (and on Wexlars thread as it pertains to GUMM). On the other hand, should GUMM hit single digits and stay there for 10 days or longer during the same time frame will you agree to the same (i.e. a public appology and discontinue posting on this and Bill Wexlars board). Please confirm that this is acceptable to you. Message 12193686 Mad2