SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Network Appliance -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DownSouth who wrote (1835)12/14/1999 12:18:00 PM
From: pirate_200  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10934
 
> I'm going out on a limb, here. I expect NTAP to split again,
> if this price holds, in the May/June timeframe. Then, if
> we run up past 100 again post split, we will split again
> next December.

Well, if we take the 4/2001 (1.10) and 4/2002 (1.88)
estimates and split adjust them, we see the following
for 1X to 2X growth rate price targets post split:

[4/2001 - $1.10 or .55 post split]
.55 x 70 = $38.50
.55 x 140 = $77.00

[4/2002 - $1.88 or .94 post split]
.94 x 70 = $65.80
.94 x 140 = $131.60

So, it is conceivable that we get back over $100 in
calendar year 2000 chasing the 4/2002 forward earnings.
I'm using 70% growth rate here and not figuring
accelerated earnings, so this may be conservative.

We eventually will get a multi-split year, but I
think we need to see some further acceleration of
earnings or fundamental business changes, like new
products that further accelerate earnings, to get
to that point.



To: DownSouth who wrote (1835)12/15/1999 11:40:00 PM
From: Beltropolis Boy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10934
 
***slightly OT***

>I discovered that EXDS is an NTAP customer. There was some discussion of both customers on the G/K thread, and the question was raised there as a point of interest.

DS.

to borrow your vernacular, is a gorilla emerging from the mist in the web-hosting bidnez? i've got one by default (AboveNet via Metromedia Fiber), but frankly, have not done my due dilly. this sector looks positively explosive and thus the valuations by most any metric (e.g., P/S) have gone cyberspheric, so i've mostly been on the sidelines twiddling my unopposable thumbs.

care to share, my simian brother?

as is pro'ly readily apparent, i have not RTFM on dirty-pawed apes,
-chris.