Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : America On-Line (AOL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TARADO96 who wrote (35381)	12/14/1999 2:00:00 PM
From: Rascal	Respond to of 41369

My understanding about Blodgett and all other analysts: What they say has nothing to do with giving us good information. They are driven by the needs of their employer and the status of the shares theemployer manages. Blodgett was at RStevens last year and was pitted against Jonathan Cohen who was then MLynches guy. MLynch had no position in the nets then. Don't you remeber when J Cohen said aol and AMZN were worth $10.? Now Blodget is at MLynch and JCohen is at Wit Capital. Their opinions are dictated by thier paycheck. What they say is an effort to create an opinion and behavior in investors to act in a manner that benefits their employer. So while their spouting may have a short term effect the basic story ( I won't say fundamentals, here ha ha) of the stock remains the same. They never give anybody a heads-up! They are only spinning for their own benefit.

To: TARADO96 who wrote (35381)	12/14/1999 2:51:00 PM
From: Annette	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41369

Do people interpret what his farts sound like? Geez he gets paid to make up stories, or what?