SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bandit19 who wrote (30299)12/15/1999 8:46:00 AM
From: KM  Respond to of 77400
 
Trading at 96 and change now.



To: Bandit19 who wrote (30299)12/15/1999 9:09:00 AM
From: TRCM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77400
 
Expect profit takers and speculators to emerge over the next few days...we can't lose sight of the effects of triple witching on Friday...option expiration always provides a little gut check..."non news" of today is negative only in the way it leads many weak longs to head for the exits...however, it's hard not to acknowledge that the recent run up in CSCO has made a lot of people a lot of money...temporary pullbacks are often constructive, as they open the doors to greater future upside potential...we all know nothing keeps going straight up...still trading at 96



To: Bandit19 who wrote (30299)12/15/1999 9:47:00 AM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 77400
 
Steven, my report on what was said on CNBC about Cisco's latest 10Q"

Message 12291547

P. re Cisco slowing sales growth, David Faber and Joe Kernen of CNBC (the ones with the brains)
repeated several times that this is boilerplate out of Cisco. Went on to say that they, like Microsoft are
always doing this, in their 10Qs and 10K's, several times a year. They manage their growth expectations.
Both companies then go on to knock your socks off at earnings time. Kernen thought it was "strange" that
Reuters happened to pick that one line out of Cisco's 10Q for their headline stream. Buy ratings to follow,
IMO.


Tony