Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (83132)	12/15/1999 3:48:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570809

Elmer, RE:"Intel posts a score of 304 on their website. Proving once again that a 733MHz CuMine outperforms even a 750 MHz Athlon"... Elmer, Elmer, Elmer...when are you going to stop throwing up those "far-fetched" benchmarks from the Intel thread? Come on now, you're starting to root for AMD just a little, now aren't you? <G> Jim

To: Elmer who wrote (83132)	12/15/1999 3:50:00 PM
From: Yousef	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570809

Elmer, Re: "More bologna. They only got a sample. More bologna about benchmarks:" Elmer ... These AMDimwits sure are "getting nervous". <ggg> Make It So, Yousef

To: Elmer who wrote (83132)	12/15/1999 4:06:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr	Respond to of 1570809

Elmer - RE: "Intel posts a score of 304 on their website. Proving once again that a 733MHz CuMine outperforms even a 750 MHz Athlon." Don't forget that 733MHz benchmark was done on an expensive i840 MB and with even more expensive $1000 128MB DRDRAM.