SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (83189)12/15/1999 11:40:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583406
 
Elmer - RE: "I expect the 800 MHz to be the fastest [Cumine]."

Yeah, when it come out...

"Nice to see all of the CuMines there, even the BX MB versions beat even the 800MHz Athlons in SYSMark98 Win98 which scores only 307."

You of all people like system configuration to be disclosed, but in this case you have overlooked that there is a big difference between the two different websites' comparisons - Tom's review has 512MB RAM while that other website only used 128MB RAM.

If you want a direct comparison of Athlon to Cumine, check out these benchmarks by Tom. They provide DIRECT comparisons.

Note that the Kryotech systems have the L2 cache at 1/3.

www6.tomshardware.com

More DIRECT comparisons for you - anandtech.com



To: Elmer who wrote (83189)12/16/1999 2:23:00 AM
From: Petz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583406
 
Elmer, re:<even the BX MB versions beat even the 800MHz Athlons in SYSMark98 Win98 which scores only 307.>

You are comparing CuMine platform with 512M of RDRAM to Athlon systems with 128M of SDRAM. Seeing as the memory on these i840 systems costs 6x more than the Athlon 750 MHz CPU, it sure as hell better beat it.

Didn't think you would stoop this low.

Petz