Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Can you beat 50% per month? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: slave who wrote (2281)	12/15/1999 9:15:00 PM
From: Joe Lyddon	Respond to of 19256

Toot-toot... beep-beep... pump-pump... chug-chug... toot-toot... beep-beep... pump-pump... (I think I can)... chug-chug... All aboard! The train is leaving the station... beep-beep... Next stop: Peak of Mt. Everest... The Holy Grail! Hope we don't have any slippage...(that would be a disaster) If the main guide slips, what happens to the rest of the gang? Would they get a refund? I won't slip... have faith... (I hope) Toot-toot... pump-pump... chug-chug... And away we go! chunka-chunka-chunka-chunka...toot-toot! (I hope I can)...

To: slave who wrote (2281)	12/15/1999 9:40:00 PM
From: Jon Scott	Respond to of 19256

I ALWAYS post the current ask on my buys, often double checking just prior to hitting submit. More often than not, my posts are on the conservative side. I always assume someone is tracking closely just in case someone like yourself ever tries to cast doubt. That is why the email service will be much improved from this thread. Considering that 85% of my calls rise a whole lot more than the spread, that wouldn't even be a factor. Then add the fact that it's kind of hard to argue with the complete record provided on this thread. Can you offer an example of your allegations? There are "a few" people who'd be interested. If you ever do, there's a fat check awaiting your endorsement. If not, I only ask for an apology. I can back up every one of my posts. And most claims are easily substantiated by a simple review of the charts.

To: slave who wrote (2281)	12/15/1999 9:58:00 PM
From: Jon Scott	Respond to of 19256

Out of curiosity, how would I possibly mislead a with a time-stamped recommendation to buy a stock at X, the stock trades at X for a day, and then trades at X x's 2- 2 days later? Are you really arguing with historic, documented fact? Just how do you explain a time-stamped prediction for a stock to hit a certain benchmark, DAYS ahead of time, and it precisely lands on that benchmark? Your arguments are completely void of substance. Though I really wish you would provide a scratch of evidence or some sort of grounds to base your claims on. I stand 100% behind EVERY post and the records are there to prove it.