SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : The Hartcourt Companies, Inc. (HRCT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DDInvestor.com who wrote (545)12/16/1999 12:09:00 PM
From: Ice Cube  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2413
 
<5) "Hyping"
DDInvestor does not make recommendations to people. We are not investment advisers. We do not give advice.
We are very clear on this. We are an outsourced PR/IR company that answers investor questions, circulates
company information and tries to counter the lies that can sometimes appear on public forums.>

Does the Dr. have an offshore account? I believe this falls into your ares of responsability....



To: DDInvestor.com who wrote (545)12/16/1999 12:21:00 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 2413
 
DoDo, are you being paid in stock? Is it illegal? Is HRCT breaking the law by paying you those 3000 shares per month?

Here's what the SEC says about this kind of activity.
May 26 On April 7, a long-standing and largely ignored Securities and Exchange Commission rule was underscored by the Commission in tough new interpretive language designed to protect investors from fraud and abuse in the penny stock market. Unfortunately, the very companies that the rule targets most directly seem to be ignoring it most flagrantly ? making a mockery of the SEC's continuing efforts to crack down on securities fraud involving microcap stocks.

THE RULE IN question bans companies from using their own stock to pay stock promoters and investor relations companies for promotional services rendered on behalf of the companies themselves. The new interpretive language for the rule, issued in late February in connection with several amendments to Rule 701 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933, was designed to prevent companies that have little or no value as investments from conjuring that value out of thin air.

The gimmick: hiring stock promoters to hype their companies to the public, while paying them with shares of the very companies being hyped. Such Ouiji board-type promotions are a common practice among companies on NASDAQ's so-called Over The Counter bulletin board market, where companies are either so small or worthless that they are exempted from having to file audited financial statements with their stockholders and the SEC.

The exemption from SEC filing requirements invites a type of abusive practice in the penny stock market that has become commonplace in recent years. The non-filing penny stock companies simply hire stock promoters to make outlandish claims for the companies, knowing that because the companies are non-filers, there is no way for investors to check out the claims before handing over their money.

In such situations, the SEC normally acts only after-the-fact, when an abusive or misleading stock promotion has already driven up a stock's price and investors have been victimized. Now, the SEC's decision to issue tough new interpretive language for Rule 701 of the 1933 Act has put companies on clear notice that they cannot use their stock as payment for the services of stock promoters and investors relations operators.

According to an SEC spokesman, companies found in violation of the rule will be required to buy back the stock in question for cash, and must carry the obligation as a balance sheet ?contingent liability? until it is
discharged. The official said offending firms also are subject to civil enforcement actions by the Commission.

What's more, said the official, there are no ?grandfather provisions? in the rule, meaning that any promoter who received stock for his services before April 7 cannot continue engaging in the services afterward.
These type of activities have not only now been specifically barred by the SEC since April 7 but are also banned by the Standards of Practice of the National Investor Relations Institute, the main trade organization for the financial P.R. field.

Taking note of the SEC action as early as March 5, the Institute issued an ?Executive Alert? to its members, calling attention to the restated SEC rule and stressing that ?consultants who provide investor relations or shareholder communications services? may not be compensated in stock or options in lieu of cash for their services.

Says the Institute's president and CEO, Louis Thompson, ?the companiesthat engage in this sort of thing aren't investor relations firms at all. They're stock hypers and promoters trying to hide behind a veil of respectability. It's disgusting.?

Cleaning up this abusive practice is what the SEC's action regarding Rule 701 was all about. But no cases have been brought since its issuance, and an SEC official says the Commission's staff has not yet even issued any individual opinion letters on the matter.

Bottom line? For now at least, it's business as usual on the Internet, where behind every press release about some fast rising penny stock company may very well lurk the impossibly conflicted self-interest of a stock promoter who agreed to hype the stock only if given shares in the company beforehand. That is how things have been done until now, and nothing seems to have changed since April 7 in any way.

The Truthseeker



To: DDInvestor.com who wrote (545)12/16/1999 12:54:00 PM
From: StockDude  Respond to of 2413
 
In response to your 5) "hyping"

Poping in and out of the numerous investor boards 24/7 on a regular basis, posting manipulative and unsupported rubbish about a company that trades @ a p&e thats off the scale. If thats not hype than tell me what is?..no better yet, don't answer, I don't want anymore "hype"



To: DDInvestor.com who wrote (545)12/16/1999 5:11:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2413
 
Here's a classic buzzword compliant hype post: "1999
Stockreporter releases updated investment opinion regarding The Hartcourt Companies (HRCT) and confirms its
conservative Year 2000 price target to $9 per share
UPDATE

In a recent press release, the Hartcourt Companies Inc. (OTC:HRCT) announced that its joint venture with UAC
Online Stock Trading Inc. has signed a contract with Beijing Telecom, the wholly owned subsidiary of giant China
Telecom.

According to the contract, Beijing Telecom will grant UAC five months free of charge for all the leased lines to be
installed at brokerage offices. In addition, Beijing Telecom will also grant UAC 1,000 NUI numbers free of fixed
monthly charges till the end of the year 2000. With these favorable conditions, Beijing Telecom wishes to work with
UAC to quickly market 162 network in the Beijing data market. The contract will help UAC to rapidly expand its
service in the Beijing area.

Hartcourt also announced that UAC has received the second government funding from the Beijing Science &
Technology Committee. "UAC 162 network" has been listed as a torch project (No. 99337), which entitles it to
receive free grants, reduced taxes and research and development support by China Science and Technology
Commission.

UAC operates the first and only nationwide online trading network in China, connecting investors with their stock
brokerage offices via Chinapac, the nationwide packet switched data network owned by China Telecom. UAC is the
first and only operating agent of China Telecom's Chinapac system.

In a former press release, the Hartcourt Companies, Inc. announced that the Joint Venture formed with UAC Online
Stock Trading Inc. of China has been approved by the government. An official Business License and Certificate of
Foreign Investment were issued to the JV. It is a significant development in affirming the legality of the JV company,
especially in view of recent confusion on foreign investment; and reflecting the desire of the government for a
speedyimplementation of the project. UAC operates the first and the only nationwide online trading network in China,
connecting investors with their stock brokerage offices.

UAC system has been in operation at two offices of China Securities in Beijing and 12 additional offices should be
wired up during the next few weeks. China Securities, the second-largest brokerage firm in China, has signed an
agreement to install the UAC system in all of its 98 offices nationwide. As the first and only CHINAPAC operating
agent designated by China Telecom, UAC is in a unique position to market the services to all brokerage firms in
China. At present, there are 4,000 brokerage offices in China serving 40 million investors. UAC's mission is to
quickly capture as much market share as possible. Total revenues, excluding the TV set-top box users segment, are
projected to exceed $40 million by 2004.

UAC is also working with Financial Telecoms Ltd (FTL) of Hongkong to create the most comprehensive financial
portal in Chinese language for the Internet users of China and Hongkong. The merged entity, with the participation of
additional well-known American and Chinese strategic partners, will proceed with an IPO planned for the 2nd
quarter of 2000.

Dr. Alan Phan, Chairman and CEO of Hartcourt, stated, "We were surprised to receive the licenses this early. Our
Chinese partners have delivered more than expected. It is a good omen for the future. We are proud of these unique
achievements."

Mr. Shi Zhang, Chairman and President of UAC, said, "Even though the profit potential of the Joint Venture is
tremendous, it is just a first step of our cooperation. Next on line is the best Chinese financial portal with the same
standards and features like Bloomberg or MarketWatch. We are creating something unique and spectacular for the
Chinese Internet users. Our market position and our leading-edge technology will ensure our long-term success."

Additional to this great news Hartcourt announced that it has signed a Joint Venture Agreement with Innostar HiTech
Enterprises of China to establish a nationwide Internet Service Provider (ISP) and IP Phone Service in China.
Innostar has been operating an IP Phone Service in Beijing for the last 14 months, in cooperation with Ji Tong, the
national wireless phone company. With the participation of Hartcourt, Innostar could expand this IP Phone Service to
other cities and provinces in China. Projected revenue from the IP Phone Service alone would be $2.8 Million in
2000. Net profit is estimated at $1.6 Million. Innostar also owns the license for a national ISP. The Joint Venture
company will provide high-speed Internet connections to hotels, office buildings and apartment complexes, using a
Chinese sattelite with bi-directional KU bands to transmit data to these commercial users. It will be a first for China.
Both parties are committed to provide the most sophisticated technology for the system infrastructure in addition to
strong strategic alliances for its marketing program. The Joint Venture will bring in additional JV partners, well-known
American and Chinese firms to strengthen its unique market position. The national license will also allow the Joint
Venture to engage in E-Commerce activities and other Internet services.

The Joint Venture will be called INNOSTAR, and should start the operation within 4 months . Innostar will hold 65
percent and Hartcourt will hold 35 percent of ownership in the Joint Venture.

At present, China has about 4.5 Million Internet users. As the phone charge keeps getting lower and the basic PC
prices are at the $200. level, China Internet Data Research expect the number of Chinese users to grow to more than
100 Million by 2005, second only to the US.

Dr. Alan Phan, Chairman & CEO of Hartcourt, said," As we said previously, we will proceed wholeheartedly with
the national ISP project. Innostar is such a powerful enterprise that we will be ensured of strong support in the
telecom industry. The IP Phone operation is currently profitable, so the cash flow projection is much better than a
new start-up. We could not ask for a better partner. The synergy created by this ISP project will enhance the likely
success of our financial portal , being created by UAC Online Trading and Financial Telecoms Ltd. I firmly believe
that our focus on Asian Internet is producing the desired results. "

Dr. Jinsong Zeng, President of Innostar Hi-Tech Enterprises Ltd, said," Hartcourt has been diligent in pusuing
Chinese Internet projects. The imported American technolgy will help us growing our IP Phone sytems much faster.
The high-speed connection via sattelite will be the wave of the future, as we have witnessed the success of wireless
phone in China. We are happy working with Hartcourt management and believe that our Joint Venture will be
successful."

EVALUATION

The following projections estimated by independent market experts according to Hartcourt's revenue projections are
based on conservative assumptions. So we consider these figures to be both very realistic and achievable: With
approximately 17.6 Million shares issued and outstanding Hartcourt is supposed to be profitable in the year 2000 and
to achieve substantial earnings of $0.30 per share in the year 2000. Therefore we confirm our share price target to a
least $9 at a conservatively estimated PER of only 30 which in case of this tremendous growth potential seems to be
even too conservative.

On the whole it may be said that The Hartcourt (HRCT) possibly will be able to make even more profit in the year
2000 than we expect. Consequently we would like to mention in advance that Stockreporter.de might have to
increase the profit expectations upon availability of the improved earnings projections. According to these facts we
are strongly convinced that the share of The Hartcourt Companies (HRCT) currently is drastically undervalued.
Therefore we believe that the Company is one of the most exciting companies to come to our attention in recent
years. Its enormous growth potential is both dynamic and unlimited.

Based on the foregoing, Stockreporter analysts comment that there is no question the Hartcourt stock is drastically
undervalued at its current price of less than $1.50 per share. Stockreporter confirms its share price targets of $9 for
the year 2000 and is convinced that this represents an extraordinary opportunity for investors.

Furthermore The Hartcourt Companies (HRCT) is already listed at the Berlin Stock Exchange, the major European
OTC stock exchange, to increase the international exposure and to establish new investor relations in Europe (the
securities code is 900 009). All these listings open the door for new major institutional investments by e.g. national
funds and investment bankers and will reduce the negative influence day traders currently have. For that reason
potential investors have got only now the extremely unique and promising opportunity to invest in the shares of The
Hartcourt Companies (HRCT) on a more than advantageous share price level.

According to these great news we are strongly convinced that the shares of The Hartcourt Companies (HRCT) is
drastically undervalued at a current price of less than $1.50 offering a short and mid term potential of more than
600%. For this reason we believe that the HRCT share still is one of the most exciting and most promising investment
opportunities for both retail and institutional investors and that the HRCT share is going to be one of the best
performing micro cap shares in the next weeks and months.

This news release contains forward-looking statements with respect to the results of operations and business of the
Company that involves risks and uncertainties. The Company's 'actual future results could materially differ from those
discussed. Risks and uncertainties of the Company will be detailed from time to time in the Company's periodic
reports to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission."



To: DDInvestor.com who wrote (545)12/17/1999 10:31:00 AM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Respond to of 2413
 
You've gone into hiding, I wonder why?: "Internet Implicated in Stock-Fraud Arrests in California. Two California men were charged yesterday with conspiracy to commit securities fraud in a case that shows both how easy it is to inflate the price of stocks artificially on the Internet and, prosecutors say,
how quickly such culprits can be identified.

The United States attorney in Los Angeles and
the Securities and Exchange Commission
contend that the men -- Arash Aziz-Golshani
and Hootan Melamed, both 23 years old and
recent college graduates -- sent bogus messages
over the Internet to pump up the price of stock
in an obscure bankrupt company. The share
price rose from 13 cents to more than $15 in
less than two trading days last month,
prosecutors say, reaping $364,000 in profits for
Mr. Aziz-Golshani, Mr. Melamed and a third
man.

On Friday, Nov. 12, according to prosecutors,
Mr. Aziz-Golshani, Mr. Melamed and the third man, Allen Derzakharian,
26, sat down at public computers in the biomedical library at the
University of California at Los Angeles and tapped into the Internet.
Using 50 different Web identities, prosecutors say, the three men sent
more than 500 messages to three hot investment Web sites over the
weekend, all promoting shares of NEI Webworld Inc., a bankrupt
commercial printing company based in Dallas. They called NEI an
imminent takeover candidate even though they knew it was not,
prosecutors say.

The case, among the first involving charges of Internet fraud, illustrates
how easy it is to send stocks soaring by using the Internet. But
prosecutors say the case also sends an important message to people who
think the anonymity of the Internet allows them to manipulate stocks by
posting false statements about a company. Although many people who
violate securities laws have migrated to the Internet, regulators say this
case shows how quickly investigators can track down anyone who posts
bogus electronic messages about companies or stocks.

"The Internet is no longer the Wild Wild Web," said Christopher M. E.
Painter, an assistant United States attorney and the computer crime
coordinator for the central district of California. "It's a new territory that
law enforcement is trying to tame. We will go after these cases."

Regulators say that the men began promoting NEI Webworld
electronically after they had bought 97 percent of the company's available
stock for themselves at prices ranging from 5 cents to 17 cents a share.
In October, there was virtually no market activity in shares of NEI, which
traded on only 3 of 21 trading days. On Friday, Nov. 12, the stock
closed at 13 cents a share. But rhapsodic messages sent by the men over
the weekend whipped up investor interest in the shares, prosecutors say,
and the stock opened for trading the following Monday at $8.

Investors eagerly bought the shares,
pushing them to $15.50 in about a
half-hour, prosecutors say.
Meanwhile, Mr. Aziz-Golshani, Mr.
Melamed and Mr. Derzakharian sold
their shares into the buying frenzy at
prices ranging from 25 cents to
$15.1875. Mr. Aziz-Golshani made
$152,742 in profits, and Mr.
Melamed and Mr. Derzakharian, who had a joint brokerage account,
together realized $211,250 in gains.

Mr. Aziz-Golshani and Mr. Melamed were arrested in Los Angeles on
criminal and civil charges. Mr. Derzakharian was charged with civil fraud
by the S.E.C. but was not charged in the criminal case.

Richard H. Walker, director of enforcement at the S.E.C., said: "Let this
serve as a warning to con men: if you use the Internet to manipulate our
securities markets, we can and will find you. Though the perpetrators in
the case went to great lengths to hide from us, we discovered them within
a matter of days."

Under securities laws, it is illegal to engage in false representations or
manipulative practices when buying or selling a security. This is just what
Mr. Aziz-Golshani and Mr. Melamed did, prosecutors say. A Federal
judge froze the assets of all three men yesterday.

Mr. Aziz-Golshani's attorney, Randall J. Sunshine of Santa Monica,
Calif., said he could not comment on the complaint because he had not
read it.

Mark J. Werksman, the lawyer representing Mr. Melamed, said: "My
client denies manipulating the market in the way that the government
alleges. Until we know more about exactly what they claim my client did
and how the market was affected it's too early to tell how this case will
turn out."

According to the complaint, one of the men posted 10 identical messages
on various Yahoo finance message boards predicting a buyout of NEI,
whose stock trades under the symbol NEIP, by a private company called
LGC Wireless. Using the Web name "ticlopidinel," the messages said:
"Buying NEIP early would entitle you to a share of LGC Wireless when
it goes public next week. Look for a massive move to $5-$10 as
wireless stocks are very hot."

Prosecutors say that Mr. Aziz-Golshani and Mr. Melamed wrote the
message and based their Web name on ticlopidine, a stroke-prevention
drug that had been discussed in classes Mr. Melamed had recently
attended as a pharmacy student at Western University of Health Sciences
in Pomona, Calif.

When a skeptic in a chat room questioned the viability of an NEI buyout,
prosecutors say Mr. Aziz-Golshani posted this answer: "I called on
Saturday and no officers were in to answer my call, just a receptionist
who are always the last to know." Then he added, prosecutors say,
"People who know of the deal are buying in given the large volume the
last few days."

But no buyout came. After peaking above $15 on Monday, Nov. 15,
NEI shares closed at 75 cents. The stock closed yesterday at 18.75
cents a share.

Securities fraud has migrated to the Internet, regulators say, because
stocks can be propelled there with little more than effusive talk and rosy
predictions. Before the Web became stock-tip central, someone who
wanted to manipulate a company's shares had to employ rooms full of
stockbrokers flogging stocks to unsuspecting investors by telephone.
Now an electronic message does the trick instantly.

Prosecutors in the criminal case against Mr. Aziz-Golshani and Mr.
Melamed contend that the Internet promotion of NEI was not the first for
the two men. According to the complaint, although Mr. Aziz-Golshani,
who lives in Beverly Hills, told prosecutors that he operates a business
from his home selling leather jackets online, messages emanating from
computers at the U.C.L.A. biomedical library last September promoted
shares in a company called Justwebit.com Inc. A review of brokerage
firm account statements belonging to Mr. Aziz-Golshani and Hooshang
Melamed, Hootan Melamed's father, indicate that trades in the company
were made that resulted in profits to both. Mr. Aziz-Golshani graduated
from U.C.L.A. last spring."



To: DDInvestor.com who wrote (545)12/17/1999 10:43:00 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 2413
 
Hey DoDO, law breaker. where are all the safe harbor disclaimers on Phans publicly issued documents you have been posting.

By: DDINVESTOR.COM
Reply To: 26281 by jointhefun Friday, 17 Dec 1999 at 10:24 AM EST
Post # of 26309


EMAIL FROM DR. PHAN

Most of Dr. Phan's email from yesterday was general business stuff, but the following was how he ended it:

"I am confident, happy and determined. Go and spread
the positive words and don't let these insects got us down.
Will talk more soon. Have a great weekend.
Best, Alan"

--------------------
DISCLAIMER

DDInvestor.com is not a registered investment advisor.
HRCT has retained DDInvestor.com LLC for a period of six months to assist it in becoming more widely known to the investment community. See the full disclaimer at:
ddinvestor.com

For its efforts, DDInvestor.com will receive $1,000 in cash and 3,000 shares of (144 Restricted for one year) HRCT stock each month.

To receive updates from DDInvestor on HRCT as well as our other profiled
companies, sign up for our mailing list at:
ddinvestor.com

View a full profile on HRCT at our site: ddinvestor.com
------------------------------------------------------

This is what they look like law breaker

Certain statements in this news release may constitute "forward-looking" statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance or achievement expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements to differ materially from the forward-looking statements.