SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (94189)12/16/1999 11:24:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Respond to of 186894
 
Mary,

Fleck has put himself into a position where he can't be wrong. It doesn't matter if he is wrong 10 times, 100 times, or
1000 times...so long as he is right just once, he will then have erased all memory of the times when he was wrong.

In this way Fleck could never be wrong. Get it?


Ahh, I don't know. Have you seen Gail Dudack on Wall Street Week lately? Michael Metz anywhere for bull/bear debates? No. Those that remain bearish long enough in this greatest bull market of all time
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
disappear



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (94189)12/17/1999 12:04:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 186894
 
Mary - re: "Fleck has put himself into a position where he can't be wrong. "
No.

Fleckenshort wasn't WRONG.

He just, inexplicably, made himself and his clients a lot POORER.

Remember - Fleckenshort runs a hedge fund - Fleckenshort Capital MisManagement - so he is losing OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY as well as his own.

I'll bet his former clients have a few choice words to say about this superBOZO !

Paul



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (94189)12/17/1999 6:37:00 AM
From: Pigboy  Respond to of 186894
 
*OT*

<< Fleck has put himself into a position where he can't be wrong. >>

LOL! And recently, Sanders has put himself into yet a smaller limo?

;-)



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (94189)12/17/1999 7:26:00 AM
From: Brian Malloy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Well, whether he's 1/100 or 1/1,000 right, it gets worse as he moves towards infinite wrongness at the limit. He is so wrong and lost clients so much money that when he does get one right, who cares?