Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: vc21 who wrote (54645)	12/16/1999 11:12:00 PM
From: Keith Feral	Respond to of 152472

Do we get to use our original cost base to determine the 1000% return? If that is the case, I would estimate my next 1000% return in no time at all. With a cost base of $6 after the split, I only need to pick up another 60 points after the split to pick up another 1000% return. I think the Q's stock price could pick up 60 points by the time the March earnings are released.

To: vc21 who wrote (54645)	12/16/1999 11:29:00 PM
From: Cooters	Respond to of 152472

<<How long do you think it will take for Qualcomm to go up another 1000%?>> I'll leave the timeframe to others, but I think the fundamentals are already in place for another 10-bagger. That is all you can ask in an investment. I had an opportunity to discuss Q's future in a group setting yesterday, and I struggled for a quick analogy. The best I could come up with was a company having an IPR lock on IP(Internet Protocol). Every switch, router, server, PC, mainframe, and now handheld device would be required to pay a royalty to this company. Q has this type of IPR potential for wireless data traffic. Comparing Q to MSFT, INTC, or CSCO grossly understates the potential. Cooters - Alright, 10X from here to 12/1/01

To: vc21 who wrote (54645)	12/16/1999 11:40:00 PM
From: jewishcarpenter	Respond to of 152472

10-bagger from here would mean $700B mktcap minimum that would ignore all dilutive increments to share count my guess that 10-bag total would require $900B mktcap I say by early y2003 we now are in the midst of valuing QCOM's future business, not next month but next couple years the greater the probability of a given business size and dominance, the more readily the market will afford lofty valuations, like now I am not saying Q is overpriced, only saying it is being priced according to its future business position (huge) / Carpenter

To: vc21 who wrote (54645)	12/16/1999 11:46:00 PM
From: Boplicity	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

vc21 will not happen for years, most likely never. Greg