To: coachbobknight who wrote (875 ) 12/17/1999 1:15:00 PM From: still learning Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4187
No Sh*t sherlock we know who bob knight is, we just don't know who you are. (don't take that too seriously, bob) I think the question was about your profile, not about NCAA. FWIW I agree a cost basis above 100 is difficult to imagine w/ this stock, but few have such a basis, so the remark about selling still stands -- we who own shares in t*taxable* accopunts must make a sell/hold determination. I have sold IRA shares and held taxable ones. I also breifly shorted but closed out that short at 110-115 from 135 for a s/t c.g. However, would not trigger stcg on taxable shares. The fact that your fund holds other people's IRA money is irrelevant to the buy/hold/sell decision, except in your case. IMHO tough call right now on ICGE -- v. high mkt cap., but strong endorsement from Ford and T; lots of new markets to enter; plenty of capital on hand; occupies strong position as one of 2 top-tier players in its space; lofty but could still go up. Is $20B too much for ICGE -- time will tell. As a market cap, it wouldn't be too much if it were the Fidelity Select Internet Fund, or the GM Early Stage Investment Fund, so why should it *necessarily* be too much? I stand neutral on it after the run up, but don't think it's a strong short. There could well be a s/t pull back but I'd close the short quickly. As to 300%; many of us are up at least that having been longs. Anyone who bought ICGE in the first week got it at about $25-50, so I count that as just a tad over 300%. Those of us who got into the IPO (myself via SFE, plus Wit), are up 20X in 3 months, so that's an 8000% return, which I'll put against any of your funds any day. No bias re shorts one way or another, but I'd say shorting this stock over too long a period could also qualify as lunacy. No offense, but I'll manage my own money rather than stick with funds, especially high turnover funds.