SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Rock Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: the Chief who wrote (1394)12/17/1999 10:49:00 AM
From: Stew  Respond to of 1996
 
Great, lucid post - as we know we can expect from The Chief!
Thanks very much!



To: the Chief who wrote (1394)12/17/1999 12:11:00 PM
From: 24karat  Respond to of 1996
 
Thanks, Chief. Great in-depth post. EOM



To: the Chief who wrote (1394)12/18/1999 8:05:00 AM
From: Ceedee  Respond to of 1996
 
Good post Chief,still have all my shares from the last 1 1/2 year...



To: the Chief who wrote (1394)12/21/1999 9:41:00 AM
From: the Chief  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1996
 
My belief is that we will, in the end, challenge Cerra Casale (BEMA/PDG) (18mm ozs gold, 7 billion tonnes copper) in size with no difficulty. If true this project will be worth about 5 times the value of Casale because of its proximity to water, proximity to a full scale copper mine, its lower elevation, its lack overburden, its geological structure and its concentration of Cu/Au per tonne.(Geological structure literally allows the overburden to be pushed over the edge of the mountain. The anomaly extends from one side of the moutain to the opposite side)

Hmmmm nobody picked me up for this error??<gggg> Cerra Casale is 18-21.5mm ozs of gold and 7 billion "pounds" of copper.

If Coiron reaches 1-2 billion tonnes at .7% copper than Coiron will hold 14-28 billion pounds of copper. Assuming the same relationship of AU to CU that Bema has, and Coiron would be the elephant we all believe is possible.

Everyone have a Merry Xmas and a happy New Year!!

the Chief



To: the Chief who wrote (1394)12/23/1999 5:34:00 PM
From: SwampDogg  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1996
 
<<...you couldn't have done any better missing this anomaly than the Chileans did!>>

Nothing like missing a good anomaly...reminds me of something that happened in SE Asia a few years back. How can companies be so careless?