To: Bill Jackson who wrote (83414 ) 12/17/1999 12:58:00 PM From: L. Adam Latham Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573029
Bill: Re: Elmer, Now we have 20 questions right. So the price or date is wrong. I think Elmer is toying with you a little. Actually, I understand what you're going through - I didn't follow options too closely until a couple of years ago, and often didn't comprehend what others were saying. Elmer said he sold 50 AMD Jan 2000 $25 put contracts (symbol is AMDME). He didn't disclose his price, but looking at the quotes, I assume he received about $1 3/4 per contract. Each contract represents 100 shares, so he received 50x100x1.75 = $8,750 cash for selling the puts. If AMD closes above $25 in January, he keeps the cash outright. If AMD closes below $25, and he still is short the puts, he will have to buy 5000 shares of AMD at $25 per share (his broker will handle all of the details of where the shares come from). Since he received $1 3/4 or so per share, his trade will be profitable even if AMD tanks to $23 1/4. The beauty of this option strategy is that this $1 3/4 premium he received has no intrinsic value (the puts are out of the money), and the price will decay with time. If AMD hovers in the high $20's, he could probably buy back the puts in a couple of weeks for $1/2 or so, still pocket a profit of $6k, and eliminate the risk of being assigned the shares. You ought to get a book on options and read it if you're really interested. Selling puts has been quite profitable in 1999, because the extreme volatility of the market has resulted in high premiums for the put sellers. Good luck. BTW - others have implied selling puts is a bullish strategy. It depends. In Elmer's case, he is profitable down to $23 1/4, which is 25% below the current market price. So it doesn't imply Elmer is bullish about AMD increasing from here, only that he thinks AMD will not tumble below $23 1/4 by options expiry in January. Adam