Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Xenolix Technologies (XTCI) 'Ecstasy'(Formerly MGAU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (4867)	12/17/1999 2:46:00 PM
From: Ron	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5143

Mazz, I didn't mean to infer metals were everywhere..just that when the conditions/geology is consistently simular, like cones, that the makeup is fairly consistent. There may be more gold or more pt or more silver etc, but the metals tend to be there. There is a guy at the Colorado School of Mines (can't remember his name right now) that has written articles about this topic. One of my neighbor's sons just graduated from there and I had this same discussion with him. As for IPM...well all the blame doesn't belong in the hands of any one party. Personally, I blame myself for not doing then what I have done afterwards....get the dirt in my own hands and check it out. Fact is now many of us (including Chuca) have spent thousands assaying from New Mexico to Calif to Montana...and it ain't everywhere, I can tell you that. But, it really is someplaces. People are far more difficult to figure out.....that may be the ultimate key to DD success. Ron