Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The New Iomega '2000' Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito who wrote (3653)	12/17/1999 3:54:00 PM
From: John Solder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5023

It's a damn shame actually. IOM should be a powerhouse in their niche. Half of their problems were self created, the other half were due to market conditions outside of their control.

To: Cogito who wrote (3653)	12/19/1999 7:25:00 AM
From: Keith A Walker	Respond to of 5023

IOM has been the Rodney Dangerfield of stocks in the 90's. Can't get any respect from any "serious" tech funds or institutions. That said, Y2K may make some people wish they had backed up a little sooner, or had a convenient and dependable means for moving large files from system to system (not just a network). I have been long IOM for several years and feel like what an Apple long must have felt like just before Jobs returned to the company. With the brand IOM has created and the solid line of products it has to offer, the earnings will come.