Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorrie coey who wrote (67310)	12/18/1999 11:08:00 PM
From: Tom Clarke	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

They never explained what Ouroboric Phallos is. They should have stuck with Disciplined Phallus. I thought they were going to make a connection with the Worm Ourobous from alchemy, but they never got to it. I think maybe they're overthinking the thing.

To: lorrie coey who wrote (67310)	12/18/1999 11:22:00 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Interesting article about masculine archetypes. I did have some thoughts while reading it ~ is the engineer really the masculine archetype in our culture? I would have thought a synthesis of sports hero and politician, maybe someone like Bill Bradley, who seems very manly to me. Or a movie star, like John Wayne, or Sean Connery. Is the tension really between eros and logos? People who are analytical by nature have a hard time understanding people who are emotional, and vice-versa. I am thinking of the Myers-Briggs test, which draws upon Jungian concepts. People who are I have a hard time understanding people who are E, and vice-versa. People who are P have a hard time understanding people who are J, and vice-versa. And so on. Analytical people think, "if only she/he weren't so childish and emotional!" And emotional people think, "if only he/she would get in touch with his/her emotions!"