SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KM who wrote (35430)12/19/1999 1:01:00 PM
From: Lee Lichterman III  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 99985
 
Well I have been trying to mull over this whole "new era" thing for a long time despite admittedly not wanting to believe it. As a trader, I have had to try to view both sides and figure out a what if scenario in case what many of us perceive as a bubble somehow proves to really be a "new market" containing a "new paradigm".
As I have studied the ever increasing new lows and scan the charts noting how brick and mortar companies are the ones leading the decline while companies with no earnings, accelerating growth ( while increasing losses in many cases) steadily climb, I have put together a few thoughts that may explain the moves however as I see it, it still points to an ugly end albeit an end farther out than expected.

Old DOW type stocks have already had their IPOs way back when and mainly raise needed cash the old fashioned way borrowing it from Banks. As the inflationary pressures start hitting our economy, future needs for cash get more expensive since rates are climbing. All the things we talk about here really do affect these companies/stock prices thus they lose value. Utility companies who's stock is bought by those wanting to capture dividends lose their luster since fixed dividends in an increasingly inflationary environment among higher interest rates also lose their luster since we can get CD's, treasuries etc that pay comparable rates eventually as rates increase.

Meanwhile the high flyers such as internets, techs that are holding tons of their own stock etc have executed or at least enjoyed a ponzi scheme where the market is willing to bid up their shares to higher and higher prices. These gains are well above the growth rate of inflation, interest rate climbs etc. Now higher interest rates don't affect these companies at all since they are swimming in cash from recent IPOs or else can sell off shares of their own stock as it appreciates 100% a year. 10% inflation is nothing compared to 100% gains in stock price since you are netting 90% gains on returns of investment.

For this reason, the tech street darlings can put forth great numbers quarter after quarter despite their real business not earning anything using return on equity as the fuel. The payment of employees through stock options also works to hold costs down since buying leaps waaay out of the money is a low cost expense compared to paying 100s of thousands to each employee out of pocket now and having to pay COLA (cost of living adjustments ) each year. As long as stock prices appreciate, employment costs are kept low, benefits are seen as great by the masses and earnings flow appears OK.

Now when they run out of stock, a market wide correction takes down all stock prices in a panic or the scam is finally discarded for real companies with earnings, the whole plan will fall onto itself. As employees realize that their entire future is in paper profits that are not in their control and that market corrections really do happen throughout history for no apparent reason, they will want real cash driving up costs of doing business. Cash for continuing operations will have to be raised the same as other companies actually paying interest for the money instead of getting it free etc. By then, investors will realize that brick and mortar companies will own the web just as much as the new comers since most people shopping at a brick and mortar store know that name and can put a .com after it easier than remembering some weird name they heard on the radio.

I also wonder how long some of the "new" era companies will be able to milk out their cash. As the cash supply runs out, I think there could be flip flop across the market. This could be the definitive time for traders. As the new era companies who constantly lose money run out of free cash, the "old companies" who have quietly been actually operating in the black will need to borrow less than the "new" companies thus they will have less interest expense and could be able to survive on their earnings alone to continue operations. Meanwhile the "new" companies will be required to borrow to continue and thus will have suddenly high costs of operation. They are essentially slashing their own throats right now without realizing it. The AOLs, AMZNs etc of the world will by then be considered "old" new era companies and their floats from stock splits will become too high to have monthly doubles in price. Note I firmly believe that this is one of the things that killed DELL's stock. Low float allows rapid gains in stock price as demand for growth companies is larger than supply. Too many splits and supply finally meets demand. Note GTW now has appreciated much faster than DELL due to lower float despite GTW being "second tier" compared to DELL. Anyway, as new "new" companies enter the arena, traders will chase these lower float IPOs for gains and abandon the higher float "new" era companies since we have been trained to not care about earnings and only about momentum. Secondary offering won't be accepted by the street and will eventually start driving prices lower instead of higher on the larger float new era stocks. Bezos will have to stand in line at the bank to get a loan just like everyone else and his stock price will look like XRX as he has to pay interest on this new cash and try to operate in the black so he can pay it back in an over heating economy he helped cause.

Now some will say that these are the leaders so they will have killed competition by then. I doubt it. In about 15 minutes, I can put up a web site myself and start selling books or whatever widget I choose on the web. AS the future unfolds and more and more people get savvy on the net, they will know how to search for best prices and since no additional driving is required, loyalties to any retailer are none existent. I know I compare AMZN, Buy.com, Borders and Barnes and Noble before purchasing anything. If it is close, I go with Barnes and Noble just because I want to see them in business versus AMZN since at times, I actually like to go in, sit in a comfortable chair and read a book while drinking some coffee.. <g>

My main point is. That new era will eventually become old era. Name recognition is already in the hands of the old era so leadership is an ongoing battle with the old guys in control already and loyalty no longer meaningful. Lowest price will win out weither new or old. Cost of capital will increase as new era matures and their setting the stage for the new paradigm will only increase their competition in the future. Just like everyone in the world, they will have to learn to operate in the black and as they do, they will lose market share to the latest new comer who can operate in the red using gains from their recent IPO to absorb losses. Meanwhile the "new loser" will have to get a loan at 25% interest and watch his stock fall through the floor until his internet server is shut down and the doors are locked. Meanwhile the "new company" that knocked him out will repeat the process.

AS investors see this unfolding, they will start weighting their portfolios with more companies operating in the black while using trading funds to play the new comers.

Just a theory in it's infancy and I am still tweaking and trying to figure out the wrinkles.

Good Luck,

Lee



To: KM who wrote (35430)12/19/1999 2:50:00 PM
From: KM  Respond to of 99985
 
The Wise Men predictions for next year. Note one guy is calling for a 50% Nasdaq correction!

U.S. equity climb seen intact in 2000, Nasdaq vulnerable
By Amy Collins

NEW YORK, Dec 19 (Reuters) - Wall Street's bull run will continue into 2000, yet not as wildly unbridled as in 1999, according to market strategists, who expect technology shares to again lead markets after a possible retreat in the stampeding tech-oriented Nasdaq market.

Market sages said they foresee 2000 resembling 1999, with ''New Economy'' companies leading the digital convergence of technology, communication, information and entertainment , continuing to draw investor funds.

Peter Canelo, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter U.S. equity strategist, expects a 12 percent rise in the Standard & Poor's 500 index next year, and a similar gain in corporate earnings. As for yield on the long bond, he puts it at no more than 6.5 percent, while inflation should stay below three percent, said.

''Underlying these assumptions is the confidence that the vibrant productivity expansion of the past four year will continue in 2000 and beyond,'' Canelo concluded in his outlook for the year.

''That conclusion is well supported by the explosive demand for information technology, the increasing acceptance of the Internet, especially for business-to-business transactions, and the advent of broadband telecommunications. These trends should increase business efficiency, reduce distribution costs, and help keep a lid on prices, all enhancing productivity.'' Canelo's favored sectors for 2000 are retailers, energy and cyclicals, technology and financials while utilities, consumer staples and telecoms are his least favorite.

Jeffrey Applegate, chief investment strategist at Lehman Brothers. notes in his U.S. strategy forecast for 2000, ''Simply put, our forecast for 2000 is that the unprecedented continues to happen.''

At Lehman, the firm's model U.S. portfolio for 2000 is 80 percent in stocks, 10 percent in bonds and 10 percent in cash. The firm expects continued narrow leadership in the stock market and keeps its portfolio tilted toward large capitalization and global growth stocks.

Standard & Poor's, keeper of the widely watched S&P 500 index, is looking for its broad market measure to rise 13 percent next year, to end at 1,600. Industries identified as holding the greatest potential in 2000 are broadcasting, technology, health care, banks, semiconductor chip makers and telecommunications.

In 1999, seven of the 10 best-performing S&P industry groups for 1999 are technology and telecom related. ''The new breed of investor, unburdened by historical baggage, is flocking to these groups,'' Standard & Poor's reports in its ''2000 Annual Forecast''.

NASDAQ MAY RETREAT, THEN PRESS ON

Many analysts express trepidation about the sustainability of the Nasdaq market's rapid climb, particularly in the 1999 fourth quarter. With such a rapid run-up, prices are expected to head lower in 2000 before any drive higher.

Arnold Berman, technology strategist at SoundView Technology Group, said technology stocks will continue to do well, but likely fall short of the stellar performance of 1999, and noted the Nasdaq could be due for a correction early next year.

Tech companies poised to outperform, he said, are e-commerce firms and all types of communications companies including satellite, cable, wireless and Internet service providers.

Ricky Harrington, technical analyst and senior vice president at Wachovia Securities in Charlotte. N.C. called Nasdaq dangerously high, making it due for a drop of up to 50 percent by February.

''People are buying stocks for the wrong reasons. They're buying then simply because they are going up, not because (the companies) are making money on the fundamentals,'' Harrington said.

But the craze for all technology is likely to slow. ''We will settle back because the good news about technology and new paradigms will be built in,'' said Primark Decision Economic's senior economist, Pierre Ellis, who forecast the S&P500 to end year 2000 at 1,575.

''During the coming correction in Internet stocks, we do not anticipate big changes in our portfolio,'' says Lehman Brothers.

BABY BOOM DOLLARS ABOUND

Edward Kerschner, PaineWebber's chief investment strategist, said a big shift in investing characterized by Baby Boomer stock investing has barely begun. As such, cash flows into equities will continue for the next 10 to 15 years, he said, citing the impact of the generation born after World War II that is increasingly focused on growing retirement assets.

''The share of household assets in stocks historically has fairly closely followed the share of population aged 45 to 54. This segment of the population should reach a peak of 18.7 percent in 2007, and then stay close to that level for the next five years,'' Kerschner in his ''Outlook 2000'' report.

By year-end 2000, he sees the S&P 500 at 1,600, and the Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI - news) at 12,500. So far this year, the Dow has risen about 21 percent, while the Nasdaq composite is up an astounding 63 percent.

ECONOMY SEEN REMAINING SOUND

Most economists and analysts expect the United States economy, spending and inflation will continue at a promising pace.

Richard Babson, chairman of Babson-United Investment Advisors Inc., in Waterton, Mass., said ''We're looking for continued economic robustness next year.'' If uninterrupted through the next early part of 2000, the U.S. economy will in February reach the longest period of expansion ever.

''Consumer spending and confidence will remain high,'' said Alan Ackerman, the senior vice president and market strategist at Fahnestock and Co.

''A significant group of stocks that have been laggards this year could come around next year,'' Ackerman said, naming small- and mid-cap stocks, such as those in the Internet support sector.

Several firms are predicting the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates at least once during 2000 and that any hike could help yoke stocks.

''A major theme is that there are at least two more Fed rate hikes, which works against liquidity in a liquidity-driven market,'' said Gail Dudack, Warburg Dillon Read's chief investment strategist. She expects the Dow to end 2000 at 10,000, the S&P 500 to end at 1,300 and Nasdaq to finish at 2,700.




To: KM who wrote (35430)12/19/1999 2:52:00 PM
From: KM  Respond to of 99985
 
This market needs some Listerine!

More losers than winners make U.S. stocks vulnerable
By Kristin Roberts

NEW YORK, Dec 19 (Reuters) - Bad breadth can kill. For even as the sweet smell of technology stocks seems to lure more money into the market, analysts say Wall Street will not escape the peril created by a few highfliers amid so many laggards.

An outright awful ratio of advancing stocks to decliners, or market breadth, has technicians fretting about a bearish downturn in the new year.

Many say the equity markets are headed straight for a correction, or a drop of at least 10 percent, paring the Street's main indexes back from all-time highs logged in 1999.

''We'll get a correction, no doubt about it,'' said Peter Cardillo, director of research at Westfalia Investments. ''Take out a selective group of stocks (that have advanced) and you can say the rest of the market is in a bear market.''

''It's ugly,'' said Ralph Acampora, director of technical research at Prudential Securities. ''The advance/decline line is in freefall. It's been going down for 22 months.''

''But very few people really understand it. The public out there could care less about the advance/decline line. When the Dow's up 100 points in a day, they're happy,'' he said. ''But technicians can't do that. It's the old saying - you have continued deterioration in breadth, that will eventually lead to a bear market.''

VANGUARD OF MARKET ASCENT: A SMALL PARTY

The market surge of the preceding year has seen just a handful of stocks like America Online Inc. (NYSE:AOL - news) and Qualcomm Inc. (NasdaqNM:QCOM - news) driving major indices higher. The narrowness is particularly acute in the Nasdaq and its unprecedented power.

The NASDAQ composite index (^IXIC - news) has gained more than 71 percent year-to-date and is poised to log its strongest year since its founding in 1971.

But the technology-driven composite is weighted by market capitalization, meaning the biggest and most expensive stocks have the greatest influence, thereby controlling both the market's spurs, and reins.

As for the smaller fry, they are mostly trading lower, according to the advance-decline statistics.

The breadth advance/decline indicator is designed to track the market's momentum and anticipate large upswings or downswings in price. It is based on the concept that the number of stocks moving higher during a market advance is positively related to the chance that the market will continue rising.

Likewise, the number of securities slipping lower can be correlated with the probability of declines.

Nasdaq has logged only 77 trading days of positive breadth out of a total 243 days so far this year, according to numbers provided by Nasdaq. And most recently, the number of stocks reaching fresh lows has increased, with the New York Stock Exchange seeing more than 400 new lows in recent sessions.

''After prolonged periods of deteriorating breadth, markets don't end peacefully,'' said Larry Rice, chief investment officer at Josephthal Lyon & Ross.

''It's rare that the breadth is going to catch up to the averages. It's usually the averages coming down to catch up to the breadth,'' Rice said.

NOT EVERYONE TAKES A BREADTH

Richard McCabe, chief market analyst at Merrill Lynch, said the utility of the measure has fallen into question, despite its correctly signaling the consumer-goods stocks bust of the 1970s and the biotechnology slip of the late 1980s.

And Morgan Stanley's Peter Canelo is one who clearly takes issue with the technical measure.

''I think people are making a mistake by focusing too much on breadth,'' said Canelo, U.S. equity strategist at Morgan. ''It's taken so many people down the river. For so many technicians that have invested so heavily in the meaning of this concept, it has not helped them to anticipate the powerful up moves in this market.''

Indeed, the trend of negative breadth has persisted for more than a year and a half. While decliners have wrecked advancers, the Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI - news) rose to its all-time high of 11,365 this past summer. Nasdaq has surged more than 700 points in just more than one month to trade above 3,700.

The advance/decline line is now at 12-month lows and according to some charting measures, breadth is reaching levels not seen since 1995, according to data from research firms Notley Information Service and Investors Intelligence.

Morgan's Canelo contends that breadth fails to accurately measure the new trend in stock buying - which sees stocks logging spectacular gains in one trading day and then ticking lower for the following two or three trading sessions.

A POST JANUARY RETREAT?

Still, many technical gurus say history will win this battle and they predict a severe market correction in 2000, with Nasdaq's top names giving up their stupendous gains of 1999.

Only after money comes out of the market will it find its way back, possibly into the cheaper, smaller stocks, they say.

If Wall Street does in fact retreat, it is not likely to happen until after January, and most technical watchers say they expect gains to continue through the first quarter of 2000.

''Money flow coming in in January should be strong enough to hold us together for the next couple weeks,'' said John Brooks, director of marketing at Notley Information Service, which provides technical analysis on global markets.

''It's the combination of weakness in the overall market, overvalued performance in the tech area, and the fact that interest rates probably are going up early next year that will probably be the cause of an eventual stop (to the stocks rally), in let's say February or March,'' he said.

MERRILL GETS WHIFF OF UNHEALTHY BREADTH

Merrill Lynch's McCabe said: ''I'm expecting a little more choppy strength between now and early January mainly for seasonal reasons.''

''But this breadth is an unhealthy condition. When it goes on this long, it's resolved by a weak majority dragging down the strong minority,'' he said. ''It'll be the big techs that really go down. And because those stocks had a big positive impact on the averages and made averages look so good this year, they may have the opposite affect of making the averages look bad and overstating the weakness in the market.''

So why are investors not afraid if the technicals are telling a clear tale?

''Because equities are basically the only place to be'' Josephthal Lyon & Ross' Rice said. ''Since money managers are paid for performance, they're going to go where they can make money. And that continues to be in large, liquid names and tech.''