SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Jackson who wrote (83596)12/19/1999 9:14:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572472
 
Re: "Elmer, Only three AMD submissions on the sheet. 500,550,600 More misdirection. Has anyone with no bias tested the CPUs under identical conditions( as far as that can be done). Since dell does not sell Athlons yet, then they have not. Comparing others without some attempt at a commonality of the platform as regards peripherals and memory type would be needed."

Compaq posted the first SPEC scores showing the CuMine to be the fastest integer processor in the world. Remember Compaq? They are not exactly wholehearted supporters of Intel. They buy from Intel because they have to. They are AMD's biggest supporter yet they didn't see fit to offer an Athlon workstation. Strange isn't it? Would Compaq falsify these scores when they displace Compaq's own Alpha as world's fastest? I don't think so.

Re: "Comparing an Athlon with rambus against a copper minus with PC-100 would not be a valid test, nor is it valid the other way. "

But Dell's SPECint95 scores for a 440BX system still beat a 750MHz Athlon while the Athlon has a 200MHz CPU memory interface port. The poor BX only has a 100MHz FSB :-( yet still wins :-)!

What does all all this prove? Only that when people accuse Intel of cheating they have to accuse Compaq and Dell as well. And why would AMD's biggest supported cheat to make the competition look better?

EP



To: Bill Jackson who wrote (83596)12/19/1999 9:25:00 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572472
 
Bill,

try to remember, all the FUDD in the world won't save iNhEL during the earnings announcement.

Missed product=missed earnings.
3 quarters in a row for INTC.

Poor Gateway and DELL.......

stAY tOoOned!
tm DRBES

Make it so,
Mysef



To: Bill Jackson who wrote (83596)12/20/1999 1:10:00 AM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572472
 
Bill, <with no bias tested the CPUs under identical conditions>

Conditions are not identical as Fuddd want
to mislead. Intel and Dell use a special SPEC
compiler with P-III SSE prefetch optimizations.
This compiler is not publicly available yet,
so you can't really compare anything yet.