Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric Mason who wrote (67485)	12/19/1999 10:56:00 PM
From: Constant Reader	Respond to of 108807

Eric, I can't find any post arguing against spending money on such a child, or advocating using the money spent on such a child on some "deadbeat that deals crack cocaine and lives in public housing" (to quote your post). Could you please point to the specific post containing such an argument? I must have overlooked it and would like to see who wrote it. Thanks.

To: Eric Mason who wrote (67485)	12/19/1999 11:12:00 PM
From: Rambi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Eric, I don't see that X was criticizing any assistance that might have been received or arguing that money should NOT have been spent on nihil's niece (or any child) at all. X is a fiery defender of children's rights and our responsibility toward them. I thought she was pointing out that there WAS a relationship between society and nihil's niece even if it was only financial, and so she was in some respects, Society's Child-- as we all are.