SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Can you beat 50% per month? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (2374)12/20/1999 8:42:00 AM
From: Jon Scott  Respond to of 19256
 
Few stocks move straight up. I try to take advantage of that given by following the simple rule of buy low/sell high throughout this common cycle.
It's hard to argue against regularly picking stocks that move up 50-100% in a few hours or days.
You are correct in the disadvantages and dislike of frequent trading. It's time consuming, burdensome, stressful, and tax-unfriendly. That is why I am also offering a reduced service for investors who don't care to stare at quotes all day. It will include long positions as well as regular updates, sent after the market is closed, of what I am buying and following.
My only personal dislike of long positions is that they tie up funds while riding out the market trends. But every portfolio should have its share of longs.



To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (2374)12/20/1999 8:52:00 AM
From: Jon Scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19256
 
One other point.
Most small investors shy away from a high-priced stocks. I'm not familiar with Steve Harmon's picks, but I'm guessing many are/were. There's the common notion, which does have much merit, that you lose leverage with high priced stocks and they fall further. Of course the argument is they are priced as they are due to market forces.
For true long picks, I look for potential leaders in the next hot arena. IATV is one frequently mentioned. That's a triple digit stock in 2000.