Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pallisard who wrote (5579)	12/20/1999 1:45:00 PM
From: Bill Wexler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

I think it's more reasonable to ponder why a piece of garbage bigot keeps dwelling on me and posting messages to me when he can't seem to get the point that I consider even Robert Yoest a towering intellect compared to him. Message 7532701 Must be the result of "inbreeding".

To: Pallisard who wrote (5579)	12/20/1999 1:59:00 PM
From: steve susko	Respond to of 10293

GOOD MORNING SH* HEAD

To: Pallisard who wrote (5579)	12/20/1999 4:26:00 PM
From: BelowTheCrowd	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 10293

Boy, those of us who followed Bill must have been completely destroyed, huh? First, anybody who follows anybody else without their own investigation is just plain dumb. I don't feel sorry at all. Personally, I followed Bill in shorting VLNC some time back around 10. I decided to cover around 5 because I didn't see any events coming that would move the stock lower. But lets say I did hold on. Lets see, I would have lost something around $10,000 bucks by now... And made double that amount on NVLS before I even got out of bed this morning! (Up 22+ with both the Dow and NAS in negative territory. Yippee.) Shorting is a useful hedge. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. If a single position can wipe you out, the position is way too big. I think most people on this thread know it. mg