Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BelowTheCrowd who wrote (5593)	12/20/1999 11:44:00 PM
From: golden_tee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Thank you for your candid response. My position is, and always has been, that your king has no clothes. You may have made the right pick here, but it was not based on wexler's input. He costs any followers money, period! His long picks suck, and his short picks suck even more. As I said, why follow someone who's research consists of "stolen" picks and lousy, unresearched picks of his own? Are you saying that wexler's picks should be followed? Or are you saying that one may listen to what he has to say, but must do their own research to avoid getting burned? I respect this rare (for this BB) admission of mistake: "You are correct. In reviewing the messages on this thread, Bill's previous thread, and others that I follow, it is clear that I could not have been aware of VLNC through anything that Bill wrote." i.e. Bill's short pick of VLNC sucked at $7 1/2. P.S. His short pick at $17 1/2 has already cost 15+% loss, when do you lemmings take him to task?