SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Gold who wrote (21195)12/20/1999 10:37:00 PM
From: Sawdusty  Respond to of 25548
 
"This thread could be a useful tool but..."

Are you referring to discussions about the massive short position? Really not sure how useful that was, but heh, a rose by another name......... :-))



To: Jim Gold who wrote (21195)12/20/1999 10:42:00 PM
From: Handshake™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25548
 
Jim I agree but enough of the rhetoric is enough. Remember after attending 2 AGMs, the last sitting side by side with your brother I think I am entitled to voice my concerns and displeasure with the Medinah management team. My posts are well within the rules of Silicon investor, and do not threaten the livelihood of anyone on this thread (except the paid bashers) or under the employ of Medinah Mining or its subsidiaries. I do like the fact that WLD is absent and that the thread has quieted down, and still (only second to your brother) have provided this thread with NUMEROUS NUMEROUS NUMEROUS DD on the Medinah subject. In my opinion anyone considering investing in this stock as a new investor or anyone considering averaging DOWN on their Medinah investment should talk privately with your brother Mike or myself privately. Anyone looking to re enter their position that was lucky enough to sell at higher prices and have the luxury to be buying back at these prices should share their wisdom with the rest of us deadheads.



To: Jim Gold who wrote (21195)12/20/1999 10:43:00 PM
From: Jim Gold  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25548
 
Vince,
You have over simplified good operational philosophy. Operators need the ability to operate as you stated, but running that way all the time is not efficient and far from safe. If you are interested I would be happy to chat with you sometime about how the nuclear industry in this country has quietly become significantly more efficient and extremely safe for the environment.