SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: slacker711 who wrote (4407)12/21/1999 11:10:00 AM
From: Cooters  Respond to of 13582
 
<<These guys are so far off it is pathetic.... >>

To compound the degree of pathetic, all 2.5G and maybe
(depending on the degree of convergence) all 3G are not the
same. If the US has a nationwide 2.4Mb/sec HDR deployment,
or 2.5G, and Europe has some botched GSM upgrade, or 3G,
then who is 'ahead'.

In case anyone missed the Q&A yesterday, IJ had a really
sweet comparison of US v. Europe in response to a question
of how the press always puts Europe so far ahead on
wireless data. He said something along the lines of, They
have the information pretty much correct, except it is backwards.

Cooters



To: slacker711 who wrote (4407)12/21/1999 11:26:00 AM
From: DWB  Respond to of 13582
 
So according to the "experts" at Strategis...

There will be 26.3 million Chinese walking around with 3G Digital assistant videophones in 2006, but only 2.8 million in the US????? Are they insane? Korea at only 5.3 for both 2.5 and 3G is also a load of you-know-what.

DWB
Q10K/Y2K+5