Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Enigma who wrote (46186)	12/21/1999 8:17:00 PM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116790

Part 1 - Question to thread. Part 2 - my reply to d (see part 1). Part 1 ------ Anyone wish to suggest more post qualifiers to add to Off Topic ? This post was initiated by my read of d's post about conspiracies, and my take is that it is just another continuation of d's attack on the GATA effort that has identified Barrick's hedging as hurting the price of gold. Many have posted that these kind of posts interrupt and even cause damage to the thread, not only in spirit but also in purpose. We can all note that some who speak up as such have also been engaged in doing the same type of activity, and when not on the sidelines but into the thick of things, one does not seem to reconize the validity of past thoughts to apply to their current task. My take is that I have complained about others, and will continue to ignore the complaint against me since I see & understand the solid foundation I stand upon. I am no different that most all in this manner. So might we agree upon some simply Warning/Attention/Note type of post prefix to warn others that wish not to be suck'ed into reading a post to only realize it's "off" in a general way content. Suggestions ? (only for this thread) Or let it slide, take no action and let it continue and continue with the complaining of wrong without anything more than Bitch'ing. Or address it like parents say to children "Just say no to drugs", and later after they become addicts the parents complain that its not their fault because their child told them they said "no". Part 2 (attack/defend/strike/chit/bullchit/garbage/...) ------ <<disappointment over the POG leads to much paranoia some of which washes up on this thread. >> <<Proof is always lacking>> <<all talk of conspiracy will evaporate. >> <<if you believe in conspiracies the burden of proof rests with you - PROVE IT!! >> <<Conspiracy theories feed on one thing - lack of proof.>> d, might a <<lack of proof>> originate from a lack of information, as in restricted access ??? Lets ignore Barrick and do a simple USA gold in Fort Knox accountability. The citizens of America can obtain thru access of a review of past acts of Congress and identify and outline the nature of this storage. ok, do so and then verify as in an audit outlined in the procedures set down by the USA government and obtain a follow thru. of d & GATA & USA citizen, erase as null a <<lack of proof>>. Doug

To: Enigma who wrote (46186)	12/22/1999 12:22:00 AM
From: Eashoa' M'sheekha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116790

____________________________________________________________ I'm not sure if it was in fact an American proposal at all -though the Administration, not Congress, was in support. The Brits were particularily keen for the IMF to act. >>CHECK YOU're FACTS As for my newly designated job - I'll pass - I think that disappointment over the POG leads to much paranoia some of which washes up on this thread. >>You know...there are many who follow ' this thread 'who don't give a hoot what the POG is from day to day. Proof is always lacking - thought I'd like to see Greenspan questioned about his CB leasing remark. >> Me too. The time will come for money to be made on the long side; all talk of conspiracy will evaporate. >>I doubt it.