Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alexander who wrote (67909)	12/21/1999 8:17:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

objective does not mean to act without conscience- "to act without conscience" means to act without conscience- you are redefining words again.

To: Alexander who wrote (67909)	12/21/1999 8:27:00 PM
From: Rambi	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

I'm not sure I understand why objective means being without conscience. I understand the battles you have with the system about your daughter's care. (No- I don't really understand it, as I haven't been there, but I understand what you are saying about them) However, I don't see that following the regulations of a job means no conscience. UNLESS the person is acting against his deepest moral beliefs by performing that job. ANd I don't know the specifics of your daughter's case. I do not see Social Service workers in general as being nutcases blindly following an immoral leader. Why would objectivity not be a good thing, if mitigated by compassion?