SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorrie coey who wrote (63926)12/22/1999 11:00:00 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
There was no specific charge. "Sexual Relations" needed further definition and the prosecutors were required to make that/those semantic distinction[s]...too little, too Late.

BS. He was required to answer truthfully. he did not. He LIED, abjectly. The Court held him in contempt and fined him over 90K.

Was "I Am Not A Crook!" an abject lie, sir?

Yes. Absolutely. An unmitigated lie.



To: lorrie coey who wrote (63926)12/22/1999 10:20:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Dear me Coey. I find it nauseating to see feminists who, having now prostituted their moral integrity to the likes of Bill Clinton, commence to try convincing everyone how good being a whore really is.

I abhor feminist ideology, but would have respected them had they remained true to their alleged principles. Now they appear to me as simply a bunch of ditsy leftist whores.

Do not join them.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News