Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorrie coey who wrote (63931)	12/22/1999 11:31:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Privacy rights? LOL! You jest of course. So in the name of privacy I may commit perjury? Really, how lame. JLA

To: lorrie coey who wrote (63931)	12/22/1999 5:06:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

The right to bear Arms is enshrined in clear English in the Constitution. The right to privacy was invented by liberal lawyers on the Supreme Court, desperate to find some, any, justification for baby killing.

To: lorrie coey who wrote (63931)	12/22/1999 10:32:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Coey. Bill Clinton's right to privacy does not allow him to invite a subordinate to a private chamber and command her to "kiss it." Once he was legitimately accused of this (it was no empty accusation), the courts accurately decided to allow further discovery into his alleged penchant for this sort of behaviour. (One would think a woman who herself was assaulted by a man would understand that a woman in these circumstances will have little physical evidence until the assault occurs. Perhaps you would rather the courts demand all sexual assault victims to experience physical sexual assault before they are heard.) Once the courts trained its attention to Bill Clinton's then alleged pattern (now confirmed) of sexually using subordinates, he was duty bound to answer the courts truthfully.