Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (80818)	12/22/1999 1:17:00 PM
From: Terry Whitman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

Ask Ken Starr- IDKJS LONG LIVE HERR CLINTON! I just hope he moves into your neighborhood and not mine when he leaves office. hohoho

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (80818)	12/22/1999 3:30:00 PM
From: Follies	Respond to of 86076

You're missing the point. Evidence is real after it has stood up to public scutiny under rule of law, not before. If all this "real evidence" could have stood the scrutiny, why wasn't in Ken Starr's report? Surely you do not accuse Starr of participating in the coverup... You must be a laywer they are the only ones who defend scum. You are surely not saying you have no opinions, thoughts, or beliefs about anything that is not said in a court room are you? Whether or not the Chinese money was quid pro quo for giving nuclear secrets, the acceptance of those huge contributions from a foreign national showed sufficiently poor judgement as to be impeachable IMHO. John Huang's testimony was suppressed by Janet Reno and consequently I have no "real evidence", but I have heard him speak and I believe him over a known perjuror.