SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joan Osland Graffius who wrote (72227)12/22/1999 5:36:00 PM
From: Earlie  Respond to of 132070
 
Hi Joan:

I think those network products will be a lot more "visible" in the future as well,..... but for perhaps a different reason. (g)

Actually, I'm not really anti-Intel, it's this madness of carting its share price to the stratosphere when things are not going swimmingly that worries me.

Best, Earlie



To: Joan Osland Graffius who wrote (72227)12/22/1999 5:55:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Joan, If Intel needs Shiva to save them, katy bar the door. <g> But I shouldn't make fun of Shiva. I made big money on puts on the stock and got out slightly ahead on the long stock when they found a sucker to buy them.

I loved John Hull's comment that at Intel's current growth rate, the smaller parts of its business may become more visible. <g>


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News