SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jill who wrote (56104)12/22/1999 7:00:00 PM
From: tekboy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
Ok, I realize that there's probably no easy answer to this one, but consider it an early post for the new thread:

you say DIMs are safer, but allow you to earn more, because they are cheaper. Is there an easy way of calculating that? And does that hold for all future scenarios, even an unimaginably huge upward move (like, say, Q at 250-300 post-split by end of next year)? And what would have to change, in terms of the prices of the OTMs, for your point not to hold?

tekboy@likeIneededanewobsession.com



To: Jill who wrote (56104)12/22/1999 11:06:00 PM
From: J Krnjeu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
Ms. Jill,

DIMS are safer, they move point by point with the stock,

What are DIMS?

Thank You

JK