Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Xenolix Technologies (XTCI) 'Ecstasy'(Formerly MGAU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karl Zetmeir who wrote (4892)	12/22/1999 10:28:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5143

Karl, I'm a bit confused. If MG has a patent and one pending for the process, why did they make the following statement in the previous press release: <<must remain confidential to protect the MG intellectual property from other companies that are attempting to accomplish the same task with refractory ores. For this reason, the company has purposely not reported descriptions of the processes>>? Patents teach, the information in the patent becomes public knowledge. Seems from MG's press release that the patents aren't that important to protect the process. Do you read it differently? Also, has anyone even heard a hint for the expected recovery costs/oz_Au_equivalent_recovered of the MG stage IV process?