SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : XLA or SCF from Mass. to Burmuda -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Puck who wrote (173)12/23/1999 8:51:00 AM
From: majaman1978  Respond to of 1116
 
Good grief this is gapping to 177 this AM.



To: Puck who wrote (173)12/23/1999 10:47:00 AM
From: Triffin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1116
 
This may explain some of the price action ..

------------------------------------------------------

To close, I have a funny story to share with you about Celera. It comes from Philip Marston, a neighbor and Fool whose wit I've drawn off of once or twice in the past in this column.

Philip did this, and you can do what he did: Go to Yahoo! Finance (quote.yahoo.com). Type in "Celera." It will say "no quote." But it offers a link: "Try Symbol Lookup." So hit that, and then type in (again) "Celera." Go ahead! (After reading this column.) Notice what happens... it gives you the (incorrect) ticker symbol "XLA."

Now hit that and check the chart this week, both the volume and the price movement. Look familiar?

What to make of it? You make the call.


-----------------------------------------------------------

Jim in CT ... CRA anyone ?????????



To: Puck who wrote (173)12/27/1999 6:23:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1116
 
Something to think about: "SMARTMONEY.COM: Xcelera Accelerates By Paul R. La Monica Smartmoney.com

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Wow! I was only gone for a little more
than a week but who knew I'd miss so much (especially since the last two weeks of December are usually very boring times for us financial scribes)? But there was the Nasdaq flirting with 4000. Monsanto (MTC) and Pharmacia & Upjohn (PNU) announced a big merger. Bank One (ONE) CEO John McCoy got the boot following the company's credit-card disaster. And then there was the news I wish I was around to write about: the insider-trading scandal involving Jim
McDermott, the former head of investment-banking boutique Keefe
Bruyette & Woods, and his ex-mistress, a Canadian porn actress
who goes by the name of Marylin Star.
But one story that didn't get a lot of coverage last week is
the 156.0% rise in just four days of trading of Xcelera.com (XLA),
a company I first wrote about the day after Thanksgiving. This
post-Christmas Xcelera column may become a new tradition. As a
matter of fact, since I gave a nod to my Dad's culinary prowess
in the first Xcelera column I'm going to do it again today. The
new addition to his seafood extravaganza this Christmas Eve (which
includes old standbys like scungilli in hot sauce and baked calamari
stuffed with bread crumbs, raisins and pine nuts) was scallops
breaded with crushed garlic croutons and broiled in a horseradish
and mustard sauce. Mmm. The man can cook. OK, back to Xcelera.

Why did the stock take off last week? First, a quick refresher.
Xcelera is a strange little outfit that changed its name from
the Scandinavia Co. to Xcelera in October. Xcelera is headquartered
in the Grand Cayman Islands, owns a hotel in the Canary Islands
and its CEO and chairman Alexander Vik lives in Connecticut. But
Xcelera's stock has been one of the top performers of the year
because of optimism about its Internet (surprise!) subsidiary
Mirror Image, a company that produces technology to speed up delivery
of content over the Web.
On Dec. 17 Xcelera announced a 2-for-1 stock split. This is
the third split in just four months. The stock popped 10.1% that
day. Then there was the news that Hewlett-Packard (HWP) was making
a $32 million investment in the company. The investment is a mixture
of stock and convertible debt. Finally, Xcelera announced on Thursday
that it had hired former EMC (EMC) executive Cosmo Santullo to
be CEO of Mirror Image. Santullo had worked for IBM (IBM) for
20 years before joining EMC last year. Investors obviously liked
the news. The stock soared 26.9% the day of the H-P announcement
and another 21.2% after Xcelera announced Santullo's hiring.
What now? I have to admit that I was very queasy writing a
fairly positive piece about the stock back in November. At that
time, Xcelera had already enjoyed a 2860% runup for the year.
How can a stock like this continue to go up? Hey, if the Nasdaq
can gain more than 80% in a year, anything is possible. Since
my first Xcelera column, the stock is up another 332.4% and now
has a positively obscene 12,700% return for the year. With that
in mind, I'd pull the chips from the table at this point if you
are an XLA investor. And if you're thinking about buying the stock
now, I'd stay away. Why?
Unlike with the newly public cache-management companies like
Akamai Technologies (AKAM) and CacheFlow (CFLO), it is incredibly
difficult to find information on Xcelera. There's no coverage
from Wall Street analysts and because of its foreign headquarters,
Xcelera does not file quarterly reports with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. You can download Xcelera's annual filing
from its Web site.
And this makes the rise last week (and all of this year for
that matter) even scarier. Sure, there's a sense of validation
of the Mirror Image technology because a heavyweight like Hewlett-Packard
is making an investment. Vik says H-P will be marketing the technology
in addition to using it for its own business. But $32 million
is peanuts for the likes of H-P and amounts to just about 3.6%
of what Xcelera's market value was on the day of the announcement.
And sure, snagging a former IBM exec as the CEO of Mirror Image
is a nice coup, but is the hiring of one person worth a 21% rise
in the stock? At one point on Thursday Xcelera was up more than
45%. That's simply ridiculous.
But I don't think you should short Xcelera either. In fact,
one short seller who no longer has a position in Xcelera says
it is awfully tough for a short to make a killing in Xcelera because
it is so illiquid (there are 13.2 million shares outstanding but
the float is just 3 million). Making matters worse for shorts
is that the majority of the shares are owned by the Vik and two
of his brothers and a holding company they control, so, the short
maintains, it is very easy for the Viks to squeeze the shorts
by aggressively promoting the stock. That may sound like sour
grapes, but he's got a point. In a market where retail investors
are grasping for anything Internet related, fluffy press releases
about a company that is in the same business as IPO hot-shot Akamai
can attract a certain amount of attention among some traders.

The stock split will make the stock more liquid and theoretically
less volatile since there will be 26.4 million shares available.
But the Viks will still control the majority. And institutional
ownership, another sign that Wall Street likes the stock, is still
lacking. According to Morningstar, there is only one mutual fund
with a position in the stock, the same one that was a holder when
I wrote about Xcelera a month ago.
Now could Xcelera continue to go up and make me look stupid
for doubting it? Certainly. But even with the investment from
H-P, I'd still be a little wary of a company that has virtually
no institutional support, no available equity research and a limited
operating history in the Internet business (after all, the primary
source of the company's revenue is still its hotel). And there
remains very little information about the company's financial
situation. If Xcelera actually announces an IPO for Mirror Image,
it would be a different story, because then at least you know
someone other than the Viks will be scrutinizing the company's
books and there will have to be more disclosure about its operations.

But unless that happens, investors have every right to be wary.
Even if Mirror Image winds up gaining a large foothold in the
content-delivery market, a nearly 13,000% one-year gain is going
to be tough to top, don't you think?"