SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pallisard who wrote (17224)12/23/1999 3:11:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 27311
 
Pallisard, I do not know if $50 is so "impossible", my own target is closer to the $30 to $40 for next year. In any event, for the very short term, I just stepped aside on this morning flurry, and this not so much because of any "impending big danger", I do not see any, but I'll be on a two weeks vacation starting next week without access to the market, and VLNC volatility is high enough to have a non zero probability of a major retrenchment in February, I'll be looking at a reentry sometime in the next 4 to 8 weeks. Of course, I may have to pay more than what I sold for, but that is not unusual for me.

Good luck to all and happy holidays.

Zeev



To: Pallisard who wrote (17224)12/23/1999 5:55:00 PM
From: Eli74  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27311
 
The general chatter regarding Qualcom's sale that I read today basically was in agreement that it was a smart strategic move, enabling QCOM to concentrate on its chip business, rather than being spread too thin in cellular telephones per se. I don't know very much about QCOM, but it seems they're the market's darlings more because of their chips, and the CDMA protocol than because of their phones. Be that as it may, apparently the thinking is that the Korean firm that is buying the handset business will be better able to gain market share in Asian markets than QCOM would. And the ultimate goal is is to expand market share for the CDMA protocol because it is better able to handle data than the competing protocols.

If anything, I would regard this sale as potentially bullish for VLNC in that it gets greater exposure for its product through the buyer of the QCOM division. Just a thought.



To: Pallisard who wrote (17224)12/23/1999 11:28:00 PM
From: Richard M. Jimmink  Respond to of 27311
 
Pallisard,
They sold the business to concentrate on more profitable
areas.
The will supply many of the components to the Japanese, also collect royalty payments.
At some point in time, the licensing of Valence technology
would add to the bottom line very nicely.
Dick