Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Interdigital Communication(IDCC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Lurgio who wrote (2863)	12/24/1999 12:45:00 PM
From: Manx	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5195

Jim: Your post reads as if you have talked to my high-tech financial expert! Recently, he (the financial expert)gave me a lecture on the same (telecom..)issues---not too different than what is ("in more detail") in Dr. Bill Delglish posts/site, etc; He also talked about other issues...e.g., OS, & Internet. ManX p.s., OT:He also is high on linux & internet...Amzon type stuff...& Corel--- but not much on Red Hat. He is in love with the technology stuff & Silicon kids with 5X million (investing funds) in their pockets!

To: Jim Lurgio who wrote (2863)	12/26/1999 12:49:00 PM
From: Dave	Respond to of 5195

Jim: I still have a hard time figuring out how ERICY is going to find an expert witness to prove the USA patent office was wrong twice for approving the patents involved in the case. The reexamination process alone was two years. Not entirely correct. Most likely, IDC is suing Ericsson for patent infringement. This is a two pronged defense for Ericsson. First, Ericsson will alledge that the patent is neither novel nor non-obvious. (Although, the patent was held valid through the re-examination through the US PTO, any art may be used against it) Secondly, Ericsson will claim that they are not infringing on the patent(s) in question. Therefore, if the patent is not held invalid, then hopefully (for Ericsson's situation) the jury will determine that Ericsson is not infringing and therefore no judgement for the plaintiff (i.e. IDC). I saw a post on Yahoo which stated that the US PTO found that Ericsson's products were infringing on IDC Patents. That statement was completely untrue. Let the courts decide. U never know what will happen! dave